Optimization (Kingdom Come: Deliverance)
Guys what kind of optimization in the game?Steve Taller We
slightly reduced the load on the stone, but it still eats up a lot of resources..
iMelnikoff92
nothing has changed at all, as there were drawdowns for no reason up to 30 frames remained
There was an old vidyuha GTX 760 (2Gb), the game slowed down terribly. At high it was 35 maximum, in settlements in general up to 25. In houses, too, up to 25. In dialogues, 20. I reached the fortress, there in the rain and at night FPS 15, that is, in general, a nightmare. Wild lags. Now I bought a new GTX 1050 Ti Gaming X (4Gb), at high fps settings it’s stable 55 at high, sometimes 60, there are subsidences, but it never drops below 45, it’s comfortable to play. So look how much the new vidyuha raised the fps. It is not necessary to take 1060 for 30 thousand. This is if you are a completely wild nerd and you want to twist everything on ultra. You can also play comfortably at 1050.
i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Gaming X (2 GB)
8 gb ram DDR3.
hardwork wrote:
Look how much the new vidyuha raised fps. It is not necessary to take 1060 for 30 thousand. This is if you are a completely wild nerd and you want to twist everything on ultra. You can play comfortably on 1050.
zadrotism is the purchase of such stubs like from 1050ti to 1070, because such cards last for a maximum of a year, and even then for medium settings, gtx 1050ti and 1060 is not a card at all, what is the point of releasing junk that loses even 980ti ??? Buying a top card puts off the next upgrade for 2.5-3 years. And of course, if you buy a top, then you turn everything to the maximum to enjoy a beautiful picture, but those who are used to sitting on flawed hardware cannot understand this. And I hope someday they will bring this underplay to mind with patches, because the game looks terrible, you can’t compare the visual picture of Crisis 3 on the same engine and this is a fake
Steve Taller
I agree, dude's 1080 tiai played with haswell..not much better than mine..it's hell in cities. Shaders, shadows and lighting just rape the map .. but even with their lowering, 60 frames with a friend could not be achieved. It's especially sad at night in the city, when guards with torches walk around and everyone is calculating falling shadows..of course it looks beautiful, but 30 frames on the top map is ridiculous..
iMelnikoff92 wrote:
I agree, the dude played tiai with hasvel on 1080..
so I don’t know if the game doesn’t work well on hasswells or it doesn’t work well with video cards, it’s just that the percentage is idle and at the same time the video card is either 98% loaded or 60% 70 out of the blue
how do you think how the game will behave on hardware:
I7-2760qm
8 gb ram
ge force 540m?
Steve Taller
well, you wrote the game. why did you decide that 1050 ti will last for a maximum of a year? I have been sitting since 760 for 5 years and have never complained, calmly played both new items and more often other games, like cs go, for example. it's just nerds like you that still feed the market, laying out unreal money for top-end video cards in order to turn the settings not to high, but to ultra. haha. overpay 50 thousand just for this. and of course the most repulsed nerd upgrades the computer every 2-3 years. there is no point in this at all, they just cash in on you and that's it. I have no doubt that your computer is much stronger than mine, but at the same time, yours costs a total of 70 thousand at least, and mine costs 30-35 thousand pissing rubles. at the same time, I play this "underplay" almost stably at high 60 fps and enjoy it, and you're on the ultras and it's not a fact that 60. well, who's the nerd here?
hard work
No, well, you're wrong. Maybe the dude makes good money and can afford to change videos at least every six months. For example, when I took my two 1080s, I had to save so much, I even bought the most deshmanskie beer and cigarettes. Personally, I have enough SLIs for two and a half - three years, and then I go back to buy video cards, because the games are eating more and more. Moreover, for 4k resolution, you yourself know that expensive tops are needed. For on a 27d monitor you can’t play at full hd resolution! But a dude of a friend has a gtx 960 and that’s enough for a year, because he plays old toys at medium settings and 30 fps to him with a bang. For me, 50 fps is hard brakes. For that, he saved money and bought himself an expensive professional bicycle that he dreamed of) And I only spent 110 thousand a year ago on videos,
But then again, you probably say that you can lower all the settings and play any game at the lowest possible, even on a 30-piece pitch?
Isn't it easier then to buy a console so as not to see the horror of the picture from low settings and not spoil the whole impression?
Ehhh ...... Great graphonic pecabria ..... And we are like hamsters in it (
And now what? I went through almost all graphonic games. And nostalgia for the games of the early 2000s began again! I still play and remember them those times when we did not look at the graphon and the numbers in the upper corner, but only enjoyed the game!
hardwork
if you are a rogue and can’t just afford to buy normal hardware, these are your problems, if you are used to playing at medium settings and never knew what it is to play at ultras, you won’t understand this. And cards like 1050 and up to 1070 are really bits, but if 1070 is at least at the level of the previous top 980ti, and in some places it’s better, then everything below 1070 is a completely miserable shit for flawed and ultra-settings is irrelevant even at the time of its release, it’s not a fact that even at medium settings it’s the same 1050ti can produce stable 60 frames at least, for me everything below 60 frames is unplayable
Steve Taller
He doesn't know another trololo here - "alya I spent 150 grand on my Titans Z each plus 10 grand shipping"))))
TRIBUNE Myshivurii
if a person has never had normal hardware and he is used to playing at 30 frames at medium settings and he has no idea what it is to have at ultras from 60 and above, then there is nothing to talk about. All sorts of bits like 760, 960, 1050ti and 1060-1070 are junk and don’t pull games on ultras, especially if you turn on anti-aliasing and all that or Nvidia buns
Steve Taller
haha, and let's not allow here. I can afford any of the most expensive cards, it's just a matter of greed, because I'm not a nerd like you, I don't need ultra settings, I like to play at high. you can’t understand that I’m trying to convey something, but I’m trying to convey that you are an asshole, but I’m not.) I feel sorry for throwing even extra money on a video card, because of which I can switch to ultra settings from high. there is no difference, absolutely. there are a lot of things in life that are more pleasant and useful than turning the settings from high to ultra)) you even say that if you are below 60 fps, then it is unplayable. uncle, you are sick. 50 fps is playable, even 45 is playable. people on consoles play at 30 fps and no one ever complains because it's a great picture, everything works great. and iron developers like you continue to profit,
hardwork wrote:
haha, and let's not allow here. I can afford any of the most expensive cards, it's just a matter of greed, because I'm not a nerd like you, I don't need ultra settings, I like to play at high. you can’t understand that I’m trying to convey something, but I’m trying to convey that you are an asshole, but I’m not.) I feel sorry for throwing even extra money on a video card, because of which I can switch to ultra settings from high. there is no difference, absolutely. there are a lot of things in life that are more pleasant and more useful than turning the settings from high to ultra)) if
you can afford it, don’t itch, but buy it and feel the
difference
)))))))))
look at my system in the profile and calculate how much it costs
hardwork
Steve Taller
by the way 1050 ti 4gb is more expensive than your computer, so you're mad)))))))))
Now I'm looking at the table and thinking, how is it ..... How is it more expensive? So. Stop. Again! Vidyakha is more expensive than a computer with vidyahy 1080ti. Suppose you did not know that there was a 1080ti, that is, a computer without a video card at all, and decided that it was more expensive than a computer. But what about its 5930 percent? It costs more than the 1050ti! Suppose you mixed up and thought that there is not 5930, but a two-nuclear stump. Okay. Further. But what about memory? Okay, so it seemed to you that there were not 32 gubons, but two. It happens to me, I somehow didn’t notice the last digit and thought that one dude has not 64 GB, but 6. Well, I just briefly ran through the profile. Yes, we found out. But what about the PSU, motherboard, hardies? They are more expensive than 1050ti! Maybe you mean some kind of Titan V???? Well, yes, that's right, this video is probably worth more than his pitch. I looked at its price a month ago. She was 224 with something thousand. But I do not think that you could confuse this video with 1050ti. In short, I don't understand anything. Seems to be sober. And here it is .... You need to smoke and understand the meaning of your proposal. Either you are our titanophile troll, or you accidentally wrote or made a mistake, or mixed up something.