Optimization (Kingdom Come: Deliverance)

dave98id wrote:
what do you recommend?
put a ssd and install the game on it)

I_fool wrote:
this is a disgrace_even the poor piranhas of 26 people ELEX optimized much better.
1070 at 4k gave out at least 35 fps. so in ELEX there is a huge seamless world and without downloads / uploads
Elex, to put it mildly, ahem ahem)) looks different))) - Piranha rides on his skate, old ideas in an old wrapper, 15 people could do it there. But the ideas of Gothic have not received development, which is a pity.

I have not seen cryengine openworld projects before, how it is adapted for this. In any case, a good try.

Here in Bohemia, at 17 o'clock game time, in the evening dawn, I wanted to sit on the lawn by the lake and smoke a pipe, I just got high, so I wanted summer. And it's February outside the window)).
The atmosphere of the game is catchy, it is clear that people tried very hard and were sick of the game when they created it, but the product is damp, but something talented and good always has flaws.

I have no problems with optimization on the map 1070 - on high, playing on ssd - I get 80+ and higher in the forest and in the yard in small villages, in the city with a dense crowd 55-60 minimum. Comfortable. Very meticulous - keeping PC clean and software in order. On the ultras it's not so cheerful. The level of even ultra settings with tweaks to blur lighting, memory management and a reduced draw distance is available to almost any config.

The game has problems with leaks and there are a couple of settings that plant unreasonably fps-there is a curved rendering of lighting and shadows. I think with patches - they will definitely fix and boost 40-50% at least how to drink - the GPU utilization is still lame.

Lech Sokolov
Patch>>>
Spoilerhttp://sendfile.su/1399366
Throw in the folder with the game
"D:GamesKingdom Come Deliverance"

I don’t know about you guys, but I can advise such settings for optimization, without much difference in graphics. 60+ fps is played. GTX690 i5 3570k 8gb ram.

Spoiler

Artem Tretyak2 wrote:
such optimization settings
There you can even play on ultra, "shadows from ultra to medium increase fps by 2 times, in cities including" - if on low, then still on top of 20-30 percent, as a result, boost up to 130 % and above only from this option, the rest do not plant much like that.

Artem Tretyak2

How so? With such settings, above 30-35 does not rise in any way at all. Even with all the low ones above 40 it doesn’t work, why is that? I don't understand anything at all. My system is essentially the same as yours, even a little stronger. The characters are loading right in front of me, and for a long time. In settlements, drawdowns are generally calm up to 20 fps. In dialogues fps 20-25. Well, how to play it. All drivers are up to date.
i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 (2 GB)
8 gb ram.

I even have everything hard on the menu. The last time this happened was with Dragon age Inquisition when it first came out.

hardwork
Our 760 is much weaker than 690, isn't it? I have the same garbage as you, everything was relatively good in Skalitz, I got to Tambelrg and got under 20 fps.

I play on ultra settings but with average shadows at 1080, in cities it usually does not drop below 40, otherwise stable 60 frames most of the time. In the game, there is clearly a jamb with shadows, they eat a lot, despite the fact that visually the difference between the shadow settings is not particularly noticeable.

fx8320 / 8gb ram / gtx 1060 3gb

then at maximum 60 frames in any place without NPC, then at minimum 30, if you approach the NPC. either the fields are drawn at maximum speeds and are not buggy, then at minimum levels there are some lags near the tree.

What is this game made of?

Flameus
Yes.
Actually, five times weaker, because when the same gtx 980 came out, the 690 was on a par with it. Gtx 690 - a two-headed monster chip, where the power was, my God, my) The performance of the 690th is like two overclocked 680s.
760th piece of hard calla compared to this once monster!

Flaemus
ahhh, that's how. Well, I'm just not an expert in this. I thought that ours is newer, which means it’s stronger. wrong. well, buddy, do you think the patches with optimization from the developers will help us? no user files, no console commands, nothing helps us, I already checked everything, checked a bunch of everything - there are no changes. only hope for patches. but even here we do not quite believe that they will help us.)

hardwork
2 GB of video memory?

hardwork
Before Tambelrg, although it is smaller than Skalitz, I thought they would help, there, with the corrected label for my number of RAM, it was 28-45 fps, practically without friezes, but when I came to the castle, everything got worse :)

treffff
so yes +-, but in general the same 680 is weaker than 770, and there is no +-, it is weaker by 5-10%

treffff
got it, friend, I'll know now, thanks.)

hardwork Your vidyuha is weak. I used to have 2 of the same GTX760 2gb and they are weaker than the gtx690.

Flaemus
yes, GTX690 is 105-115% more powerful than 760

hardwork
Try changing the settings from 1980x1050 to 720>1980x1050 or 900>1980x1050.

I have an Intel Core I5 ​​3470, 16gb of RAM, the game is on the SSD and the video card is 760 24 FPS in the game and 9 FPS in the videos....