Overclocking: all about overclocking processors v.5

MunchkiN 616
There are no others on the market. There is something from the eug, and even that one is only for the bestserver.

Spartak_13
and why exactly m-atkh? if for a game pitch this is a very dubious acquisition.

MunchkiN 616
Why doubtful?

Spartak_13
on m-atkh it is necessary to take current if there is a goal to collect over a compact game pitch.
and here 2 problems arise. this is the cooling of the processor and the length of the video cards and their number and the cooling of all this.
If there is no goal to collect a game stump, then I don’t see the point of fooling my head with a pitch. usual atkh in a budget building for 5 haymakers and some 980 there too.

Who clocked 4670K, and to how many values, I still can't overclock a pancake

MunchkiN 616
Well, if it's a multigpu, that's understandable. And what about the process?

W3aMisterWinner
Mother of asus z87-plus

MEI0188
Start with a simple BIOS CPU Ratio set x43 to start, if Windows starts normally, test it for stability, stress with the AIDA64 test, for example, drive about 15 minutes, see how many core temperatures, more than 70C, do not drive any more, if you can raise it to x44 less and check again, etc. How much do you use?

It's just that my 4770K is already 2 years old, and a hot pi..dets came to him, under the lid of the protsa the edge of the "crap paste" dried up, during the service life of the pace it grew by 15C when overclocking only @ 4200, the same AIDA64 to 72-75C immediately from the start test jumps, before it was naturally ~ 60C. So there is only one diagnosis, to open the patient and smear it, otherwise it won't last long, it's stupid in games under 70C, my sadness is shorter.

W3aMisterWinner
I know that throttling is 100C, the point is not that it is far from the limit, but that I don’t want to put up with that every year the temperature will rise even more, so you can wait until it will fry at the factory frequencies under 90C. The shit under the lid limits the possibilities of the processor, this is no longer for the sake of economy Intel has done, but for the purpose of marketing, so that they can be covered faster and change, like the machines are now in principle.

DozoRRR
every year the temperature will rise even more

80 in games may be the norm. But if it's some kind of exotic processor, then 73 may be a rarity. But 78.5 will definitely be the norm for the majority.

MEI0188 Stupidly
in the BIOS you set 4.2 -4.4 it starts normally without touching the rest of the indicators, my temperature in stress under 4.2 does not rise above 62 degrees (linpak), under 4.4 already 70 degrees shows linpak, this is essentially not serious overclocking, although for constant games I would not recommend driving above 4.4. More than 4.4 without changing the voltage manually does not take - it does not start.

W3aMisterWinner
It will take many years before it heats up to 90. You can spread the press, but I think it dries out the same way as thermal paste, because in fact it is its analog
. which are fucking smeared with ZhM.
VITYA_KOLYADENKO
What are the norms, if I know that it used to be colder. There is simply no room for more overclocking, although at first when I bought I drove into processor-dependent games @ 4400 1.3v and 75C then it was with such overclocking, and now at 4200

ok, I’ll try the current, I think the thermal paste should be changed or not - the computer has gone for 3 years, now the average temperature is 33 degrees

W3aMisterWinner
Firstly, it can't be up to 70 degrees in Linux. That means the old version of Linux. Try a new one with AVX2 and your percent will be fried for 90-100 +
This is an Intel test, it tests linpak but without awkh, yes. Did I say that I tested ABX? I don’t remember even.
And yes, I just drove out the OSST - 86 reaches 4.4, but this is the maximum, provided that the fan is idle at 980 rpm.
There is


no spoiler about any 90-100 speech.
Spoiler
Further, if you did not touch the voltage, then it is automatically set, which means that when the multiplier increases, the voltage also rises. If it does not take it above 4.4, then the mother limits it.
Mother does not limit if you manually set the voltage, you take it - set the multiplier, set the voltage - if it does not start, you increase the voltage until it starts to start. this has always been done. on a car there is a limiter just for the voltage limit as well as on RAM, for example.
With a simple setting of the multiplier, it starts until then on the machine until which a safe threshold is stitched in the BIOS. For example, with extreme acceleration to no mother will start automatically until you manually set all the necessary parameters, and not just a multiplier.

I haven't read the topic as usual, but I condemn it.
On the topic of overclocking the hasvel and the results Watafaker
1) Comrade i5. i7 would have warmed up much more under AVX. By the way, the speed of the cooler starts to really affect only at the 2nd minute of the test, before that heat is absorbed to a greater extent by the heat capacity of the heatsink itself.
2) As far as I know in OCCT AVX of the first version.
3) It makes no sense to use AVX2 as a stabilization test, it is not used anywhere except for acceleration-specific professional computing (and XTU).
4) The XTU apparently monitored the CPU temp and not the core temp
5) As for the voltage - a correction for vdroop. If LLC is not set (it does not work for cars) then with set 1.3 given it can be 1.2 and even lower.
6) Any mother puts inflated springs on a car, especially on anchor (VTT, VCCSA)
7) If Hasvel does not take 4.5 by 1.2v (given), the chip can be thrown away immediately. A friend of mine took [email protected] on the water.
8) You can always throw it on vcore and post it, but it may not give stability. Especially if you drive prime95 / linx / XTU and other IMC dependent stresses. I usually start by putting VTT and VCCSA hands at 1.1v. On the haswell VCCSA in the drain 0.95 or even 0.9, with a big difference from vcore, you can start catching random 124 bsods, which will only get worse with increasing voltage on the process.

DartMaul
But this is purely for the fierce fans of overclocking and markingabench, a simple man in the street needs to - for the games to stare, press the auto acceleration button and be happy like a wolf, or, for example, press the boost turbo - already count the acceleration by two points, then he could get the auto acceleration, he is happy as an adversary. To look for the overclocking limit of the processor for everyday use is somehow harsh, especially if 98% of the time you surf the Internet at a frequency of 5.0, cake.

W3aMisterWinner
@ 4400 1,3v - Seriously?
There is nothing to compare, I apologize x ... th with a finger, hasvel with a devil horse (there are more capacitors + more selected stones), but my percentage is not the best, but as practice shows, when changing shitty paste to ZhM, they give 100Ghz at the same voltage , I think 4500 will take, if not, then 4400 will be happy, but most importantly at lower temperatures.

Vatafaker
Just those who are engaged in overclocking will never drive the chapel 24/7. Moreover, there is EIST. On the Hasvel, in general, it is quite convenient, the auto voltage is tied to the final frequency and not to the multi (as on ivy and sandy), which allows you to use a strap. Moreover, on some motherboards, EIST drops the voltage even from the manually set value.
And all auto acceleration at 200 MHz is for self-assurance. There is no understanding of what overclocking is, how it is done and what it affects - you should not even go into the corresponding BIOS tab.

DozoRRR
haswell with devil horse
On a large sample 4770k> 4790k. So that.
And the extra condenders on the belly for 24/7 overclocking do not give absolutely anything, and there are no other differences (if you think that DC is better missed - a serious delusion)

is this auto acceleration the one on the bus?
even in mp where actually all overclocking was based on the bus, it was never stable. so every 20% overlock I don't know who can use it.
Regarding any i7 47xx, I finally don’t stick to why the gaming computers have any overclocking on them, I usually observe one video card in such pitches and finally not pulling it right. the processor is threshing cleanly into idle and even with some kind of an opaque 10 optima or performance.
And considering that those gaming computers that I often see are assembled according to the residual principle, where the GPU is according to the residual principle, I am sincerely surprised why Intels with thermal paste under the lid finally can this overclocking. that is, they certainly need it as a kind of last exhalation of a driven horse. but by the time this is necessary, a person should already have formed a certain base for presenting how to squeeze productivity out of his iron, and therefore overclocking household and sports overclocking will always be the work of people of a certain circle of magical isoteric knowledge and other pitch of witchcraft. for people who are simple pitch, this is simply not necessary or harmful to the health of pitch. therefore, they have nothing special to meddle with.

DartMaul
Yes, I agree, you can overclock this way, but it scares me when the frequency with voltage flies from 0.8 to 4.5, for example, when you open a tab in the browser or some other gestures.
By the way, I wanted to ask this does not negatively affect the processor?
You are generally a professional overclocking, as I see on the forum, tightly on this topic, right?
I love overclocking, but I don't need it yet except for the sake of pampering (a weak RAM, a video card is shit) :(
MunchkiN 616
No bus is a tough topic, I haven't seen this for a long time.
Auto overclocking is such a tricky button on motherboards and in bios - pressed and it turns on the overclocking profile sewn by the manufacturer. It overclocks a little and everything at once - RAM, protsik, changes quite a lot of parameters in the BIOS. Like the manufacturer in the laboratories drove overclocking and sewed in a balance / performance profile, so that overclocking was not blue and the percentage was not throttled even if there was a boxed cooler. sparing time. And so this is just an overclocking profile from the manufacturer so that the user presses the button for pitch and does not bother with questions such as what voltage to put and what to turn off in the BIOS for heightened effect and what to leave. On some motherboards, such profiles severely overestimate the voltage. or for example, this overclocking locks all the cores at the maximum frequency at once and turns off all speed steps and turbos, the percentage is constantly threshing at 4.0,
And right now, there are a lot of overclocking profiles in the Internet - just like cheats with PG you can download and try, lol