Overclocking: all about overclocking processors v.5
In this thread we are discussing overclocking processors.Before asking "how to overclock", I recommend that you familiarize yourself with the materials provided at the following link.
Matchast for a beginner overclocking
On the benefits of overclocking. Part one, theoretical
On the benefits of overclocking. Part two R11; overclocking the processor and RAM
BIOS settings reference
Overclocking Core i7-3770K: learning to make compromises
Previous topic here
Watafaker
actually look at the conditions of the turbobost and the ratio of the temperature load to the frequency.
overclocking by a turbobost is absolutely not profitable, so it can be surprised only at a low temperature in a single stream,
so this turbo should be turned off at all and the upper support lifted. all the same, there will be x8 in idle time and will not turn around the clock, say, at x45.
Second, when reaching 4GHz without boost, it is necessary to raise the voltage on the memory and the chipset and start driving the bus in order to overclock the memory controller. mmhtsov so 10-15 how many will take and so that the video card does not fall off.
here will be the ultimate benchmark gaming overclocking.
actually, as far as I understood, select the divider to the memory of the bottom. Also, the overclocking of the express controller will actually cover the ceiling of such overclocking very soon.
MunchkiN 616
so raising the frequency by a multiplier is the same as raising the turbo boost threshold.
There is a turbo enhancement when turned on, it just boosts all cores at once, a simple turbo boost gives +400 with two load cores, +300 for three and +200 for four, and an enhanced turbo immediately gives +400 for all cores, which is basically the same as setting the x38 multiplier without disabling the speed step.
dragging that all this bang is regulated as you like and you can overclock the kernels separately, each in its own way, but IMHO is already game.
As for overclocking on the bus, I have not seen many opinions, all agree on one thing - there is little sense, there are a lot of glitches. If it is possible to overclock with a multiplier, overclocking on the bus is game.
as well as to ignore memory - in benchmarks it can and gives a rate of increase, but in games there is generally no sense from 2133 memory and above.
Watafucker, the
processor corral across the controllers, makes more micro instructions per second with access to memory, and therefore these are the very dravkals from which everything emanate from the memory. games such as ac4 as-yu, butman syndicate and even sruzis with foofelout4 will say thank you
MunchkiN 616
Well HZ which there can be growth, just not usually chase the bus, probably because these gains are not visible in Igor :-(
And there are all sorts of problems.
But avtorazgon not remember me Che is in the tire or not. He is there is a lot of things that change, you have to look.
Vatafaker
all sorts of software programs have been running for quite a long time with all sorts of tires. even in the days of the phenomena of Blac Edishen for sure.
it was with them that the potsones were dispersed and the marvel was given to disperse at 100-200 MHz. they raised their hands to the heavens and groaned - why not accelerate.
as well as earlier in bios there was such an auto-acceleration, it acted on the same principle.
MunchkiN 616
Well, before the kids were driven sluggishly on the tires, I myself remember the bark dual from up to 3.5 overclocked and was glad + 3-5 fps in games!
3.5, it was juicy at 3200 standard input! Then not a single dual Korik beat like that! And I used a constant, and even the temperature was 50 with a boxed cooler. Toka then went and 5 m my dualchik rotted even with ragon.
And I remember phenomes being driven on the bus MASSIVELY and driven constantly, to EVERY CORNER! probably overclocking on the AMD bus is more pleasant than Intel.
I did not have auto acceleration in the tare mothers: ((the mothers were from the series G41 bottom, etc.)
Watafucker
The fact that the voltage jumps is not a problem, it is EIST. Energy saving, works extremely stable and does not cause a problem even with overclocking.
To love overclocking in it, you need to understand.
Oh, what a gift for those who are currently (hard times) assembling a computer from scratch. An attraction of unprecedented generosity, acceleration of blocked processes.
Spoiler 
Now you can save a serious amount and invest it, for example, in a video card. For example, an assembly of i5 6400 + ASRock Z170 Pro4 / D3 + 8Gb DDR3 + GTX970 + SSD + PSU will cost less than $ 900 and will have the maximum price / performance.
I
do not like DozoRRR that in this situation energy saving and AVX do not work ...
And to drive on very cheap motherboards is also not so hot, no matter how it comes back to haunt later. But on the other hand, the trend is certainly good. Intel is now tearing the hair on its ass and, most likely, will soon roll out a ban on such actions.
-Sergei Viktorovich-
Spoylerhttp: //pclab.pl/art67575.html
Here is an article, everything is painted, the pros cons. Turning off the power whistle does not increase consumption much, and then in idle time, in games, for example, it is the same, AVX does not affect the performance at all, judging by the article.
DozoRRR
One of the first to overclock to 3570 - this is in the maximum turbo and on the bus to 105.
W3aMisterWinner
The multiplier who does not chase , does not chase from that (i5 / i7 without the letter "k" starting from series 4).
And the difference is still big, 1 Tick + 1 So they gave some effect.