Gothic 3 vs Gothic 2 (Gothic 3)
I just thought the second would be cooler, especially for its time (to be politically correct I will add that IMHO)))). The plot is not so linear there.And in general, where did the inscriptions on the graves go, like "I lay down to rest a little ...". Yes, yes, I liked to read them)))
I'm not hinting at anything. It's just that in the previous parts there is no such feeling)) At least for me.
I’m only for gothic 3, for all the bugs and a lot of things that were not realized, the JoWood company is to blame, and so gothic 3 is beautiful, I passed it for Ksardas and I want to go through it 2 more times for the orcs and assassins (Beliar), for the king and his rebels (inoss ) installed CP 1.73, in Gothic 3 it was disappointing that there the hero foolishly holds a two-handed sword by the blade, like an ax, and that it is not easy to turn off the automatic activation of the weapon (when you raise the bow and it sticks to your back) I in the first and second parts did not play because of dull heavy control (worse than in dark sauce 2) Arcania has a wonderful world, but the engine is shit in control, there is no free movement as in Gothic 3, Arcania 3/5, Gothic 3 5/5, piranhas are not to blame the fact that the game is not optimized, they did the most basic thing and wanted to add more buns and different animations when holding the weapon,but alas, JoWood started the game to publish iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii bugs, after optimizing the game, patch 1.12 does not fix anything except the normal FPS and quests, but as a symbol of the game of the most powerful creatures