Optimization (PC) (Metal Gear Solid 5: Ground Zeroes)
How are things going with this?I don't understand why everyone is screaming about optimization, yes, the graphics are beautiful, but because of the lighting it is clean, i.e. visually, but technically there is nothing like that, the detail is low, the textures are bad, there are not very many polygons either. If I had a game with such graphics slowed down, I would generally be very surprised.
PS Children who say that the graphics are even worse in Unity there, lol.
Normal optimization, from 560ti fps in the region of 50-60 at the maximum, only sometimes drops to forty. A little upset by the lack of resolution with aspect ratios 5: 4
Dr. Otto Wolfgang Ort-Meyer
hmm ... interestingly, the current played on the 7870, I just set everything that could be at the maximum, if you turn off the vertical sync and the frame rate automatically, then if you do not look at base 60, when looking at the base 35 fps, but if you put vertical sync + lock fps 30, then I like it even more, without jumps, everywhere 30 and that's it, I'm not chasing over9k fps, if the game itself at 30 fps goes well, then why not? I have a problem in another it was, with a long run along the level, the RAM starts to rise and rise and some incomprehensible freezes begin, I don't know whose it is so D: I got up to 8GB out of my 8
The optimization is great. At max it produces from 30 to 60 fps, on average 45 frames. Hopefully, the full-fledged Metal Gear Solid 5 will be the same.
TheMauoHe3
Personally, I also twisted everything to the maximum, I just cut down the vertical and the shadows with lighting are high, the FPS keeps around 50 even if you look at the base (well, if you don't look, then 60 is understandable), and I play with stable 48- 52 is better than 30.
Optimization is super, the only fps is unstable, the score is from 60-45. I play everything at ultra.
The optimization is so good that on my system at high it gives out 60 fps stably.
Optimized for giraffes. Not very good for radeons. On R9 280X 50-55 fps
By the way, what lags can be if the graphics are two times worse than in the same Hitman Absolution?
At 60 FPS high, the optimization is excellent. i5-4440, GTX 650 2GB, 8 GB RAM.
walitor
In the unit, the close-range current graphics are good, but not masterpiece. Once you climb the bell tower and see what is a little further, you see only porridge and soapy textures. Plus, the visibility is poor. As one person has already said here, in the asasin only the lighting is good. And I generally keep quiet about optimization.
Ishamael
Since when is 50 fps laggy ?
I have 45-50 fps at full maximum of 1080 pe. Core i5 2320, GTX 760 2GB, 8GB Ram.
Ishamael
Very strange, on my 3 cores five years ago from the same amd and 7770 1GB there is at least 55 and on medium only shadows.
n0t1hing
In absolute terms, the graphics were really a little better (not 2 times, of course, but ...). There are many details, the picture seems saturated, but here everything looks somehow empty. But stylish thanks to the lighting. The Japanese in general, as I noticed from DMC, RE, FF, etc. primarily trying to do the best possible for the characters themselves and frequently used items. And the details of the environment, which the eye does not cling to, are done already in a lower resolution, low poly, etc. (great example of RE6) Thanks to this, excellent optimization is achieved, and the picture is not annoying.
Yes, the graph is good here, so also the optimization is just sidetracking, unlike AC Unity ...
http://www.overclockers.ua/games/hitman-absolution/26-big-hitman-absolution.jpg
For example.
n0t1hing
You seem to be registering here to argue with someone out of boredom?)
And at 19:30, in your opinion, it means not a dispute)
I just tried to explain to you that the graph in GZ is not so beautiful.