You might understand (Fallout 4)
1. After watching the trailer, many were disappointed. How so? Juicy, colorful and bright picture. So I got an idea. Suddenly, the developers will show us some events before the disaster, before the wasteland became a wasteland. The trailer showed the house, destroyed and not. Maybe the game will move in time, there, before the catastrophe and back, already after some time after.2. You also didn't like the animation. Yes, she's a little oak, but she's not bad either. Why do we love Bethesda games? For modifiability. But not only of course. Maybe this is the perfect engine for creating mods. Therefore, it is only improved and "marafetted"? I do not argue, there is also RAGE, the second modifiable engine, of which there is. In fact, only GTA and TES / Fallout are the most modded games. But RAGE is not owned by Bethesda. And it takes a lot of time, resources, etc. to develop a new engine. etc. Therefore, you just need to understand that everything is not so bad. But the game is guaranteed to start at least at the minimum and will be playable for everyone who has Skyrim at high 30+ fps.
That's all I wanted to say
Ret Ert
Che everyone has so many questions about this.
Obviously, they simply showed the events before the explosion, how it happened. Maybe this will be an introductory video for Fallout 4.
In fact, the trailer constantly switches between "before" and "after", and, before the explosion, and years after it, the scenery looks absolutely identical: bright, colorful, fresh, like a new playground.
In short, I didn't like that after the evacuation everything looks pretty fresh where the shepherd is rummaging around,
even when it runs across the bridge, it is not even rotten there.
voshchem I got the impression that events take place after a couple of 10 kof years after the war and such a mine is not interesting. either the game will be y or the video was given to do the wrong posons.
Srisis 3 ito looked more atmospheric.
Marquess
Why do we love Bethesda games? For modifiability
Sorry, but do you think that the developers are deceiving you? What I mean is that we play a training ground for mods, that the developers do their job 50% and not 100 ... Let's be honest ... in Skyrim without mods, I don't want to play at all! IT IS A FACT! For me, it's better to let them do everything 100% than to give them a stump, so that later for them the craftsman will finish it for us for free!
PS It is alarming that Besezda has so many projects already, and the plot is mediocre so much that you just wipe a tear looking at it ...
Why, tell me, 10 years after the war, airships fly, there are huge cities and the Enclave rides on vertiberds? So your theory is broken. Fallout will be a complete shit that few people like.
Wheatley.
The developers in Their Tweet confirmed that there will be time travel.
Marvelosi
if they did everything that fans did in mods, it would take at least 8-10 years to develop the game. + fashion is the key to a long project life
My version is that this video itself is a "fairy tale", this is the opening video, and not the gameplay. For example, as in foul 2, there are slides at the beginning and, like, a background story is told, where: war ... the war never changes ... Or as with the third foul, an introductory video with a receiver in a crashed bus. In general, this will be a video that will spin while the game is loading, and the video itself briefly tells the entire background of the foul series. They also show how people run to the shelter, how the native travels with the dog ... In general, the video contains the whole background, but no one knows what the plot of the new foul will be.
mark25
And again ... the developers have confirmed that the Movie with a Mix of Gameplay, the game has been made since 2012.
The famous insider Shinobi602 also confirmed that a release in 2015 is quite likely, since the game has been working on for quite a long time. According to leaked documents, the game was in full swing in 2013. Some sources claim that development began in February 2012, so by the end of 2015 the studio will be working on Fallout 4 for almost 4 full years.
I agree with the author.
Bethesda is not the kind of company that made games for graphony.
Their games had an atmosphere, a soul was felt, if I may say so, as, for example, in Gothic (1,2), in Stalker (especially in PM), or as in the first Reisen.
Marvelosi
Well, I don’t know, I just came up with such an idea, because well, the developers will not once again repeat the story with the dog. In 2 foul a lot of dog + dog is a failure, in 3 foul too, you go clean the dump and tame like a stray dog. I do not think that the newly developed disc will be re-launched with the discovery of the dog. Therefore, this idea came to me, that this is the background of past events.
mark25
In 1 fell there was a dog, in 2 there was one + failure + cyberpsy, in 3 it was, in NV you can tame a robobog. The chip of the series.
Bethesda can already be praised for showing us honest graphics, and not a CGI trailer with promises (lies) that this is supposedly the graphics in the game.
mark25
My version is that this video itself is a "fairy tale", this is an opening video, not gameplay. For example, as in foul 2, there are slides at the beginning and the background story is told, where: war ... the war never changes ... Or as with the third foul, the opening video
Thanks, captain!
MaJaHeT
Bethesda is not a company that developed games for graphonium.
Their games had an atmosphere, a soul was felt, if I can say so
About biovars the same could have been said literally a year or two ago ... And now ... The
post-nuclear palette has already been removed, making a mixture of Bioshock and Rage, what will they do next ? ..
"we want fallout 4!" - * the trailer came out * - "grafonia shit ko-ko-ko - it would be better not to come out!" and then these people and others like them will whine about the third halva. fuck you ungrateful bastards.
Showy DiMak
and then these people and others like them will whine about the third halva. fuck you ungrateful bastards.
Gamers are now capricious, like children, always dissatisfied with something.
Den-z2011
That's just interesting to eat what? Good games? Is this bad or what?
And besides, there is no point in condemning the game based on one trailer, and not even a gameplay one.
Ret Ert
in this case, the vine started just after the announced game with only one trailer. and knowing the work of bezdezda, with a probability of 95% the game will be good, but most gamers (snickering individuals) are interested in savoring only the graphics. even if techno-demos / benchmarks are faked in this case - my only advice is this. Why are games needed at all, if gameplay is not so important now.
Ret Ert
If you cover the release of games for a couple of years, and then bring in some kind of magic, they'll eat it like candy. There are too many games, that's why they show off, find fault. And not because there are flaws in the game. So there are no ideal games.