4k TV and games in 1080p

01001000 01101001 wrote:
Monitor $750 and graphics card $250.
Well, go buy it, why don't you buy it? )))
My monitor now costs 170 thousand, but it cost 90 thousand. Unlike video cards, monitors were available for a long time, more than one year. And how many times I wrote, buy not shitty Pascals 1080, which are now outdated like mammoth shit, but monitors while they are available. As a result, whoever bought the shitty 1080 is now left without a monitor and without a video card. The beauty? Beauty! Why does a man need a head? probably something to grab. Therefore, your dull bombardments cause tokma zhavlost and sympathy. )

01001000 01101001 I
found another one:

01001000 01101001
This is what the Persian looks like on my screen:
And where are the msi afterburner indicators??? And what is that inscription at the bottom of the picture? Like it was taken from the net.

01001000 01101001
potter790
Here, I dug out Folych on ultras. The test was made a long time ago on two 1080 jetboxes. The game is not a litsuha on a disk, but the first pirate. For the life of me, WELL DO NOT MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT gtx 660 in 4k in Folich!!!! So no need to call. Yes, the test is old. I do not argue. Since the game became more demanding in the future, when the developers, through new patches, made the rendering of the range and detailing of the textures much more impressive than before, so two 1080s would hardly have coped with it now. I see a lot of lyrics and balabolism. Therefore, the verdict is as follows: All three of them need to do the Folych test in a forest area with all the msi after indicators. and showing graph settings, starting with slave. table. And let's see where the 660 does. There will be 10 fps at most.

MOSHIVURIA lapwing
I threw you a screen of what my Persian looks like in 4k on ultra with a GTX 660. He does not believe ...

You get used to a lot. The guys behind 32 monitors don't settle for anything less.
Imagine being able to play a game, watch movies, or like you said pron at the same time. OR you can make documents - on the one hand, listen to music, watch videos - on the other hand. And can watch 4 channels at once, switching between them. Which is exactly what I do. Now I watch TV channels and write you a message. Certainly. the screen is visible from a distance, so from the couch I can see new messages on Skype or watch several channels. It's just that I can or want to. I play strategy and watch a movie, if I like it, I turn on the sound, no, it goes in the background to understand its meaning (and so it will do). In general, everything is very individual, especially the distance. You're right, you should save your eyes, but there is already brightness for this. And the price is subjective, I don't aim for 100 inches.
More tasks. I have more work and films. I'd rather watch movies on TV than on a monitor. The level and quality is completely different. Imagine this on a large panel, not a small monitor, where you constantly stare at the point, and here on the sofa and a 4k movie on a 4k TV.


MOSHIVURIA lapwing
Spoiler
MOSHIVURIA lapwing wrote:
Hefty, bulky, you can’t sit next to it, because your gaze does not cover the entire picture
. There is peripheral vision. You will be surprised, but the concentration of all actions takes place in the center of the screen, because the sight in the shooter is so located. In strategies, there is a large, readable picture, which is important and of course, you have to look away if you are sitting close, drive in the corners - resources from above, from below the squads panel, functions.
MOSHIVURIA lapwing wrote:
especially in network tournaments it is problematic to play because of this.
I don’t think that a TV can be called a gaming one. It is not right. I caught myself in this place yesterday. You yourself know that a serious gaming monitor is better, with a nimble matrix, and yes, dimensions and a review make more sense here. In a single, you can sit and look around as much as you like and as you like. Especially stealth and where you can look through the walls or evaluate the figure of the enemy behind the wall. Everything is quite large and there is plenty of time to react.
MOSHIVURIA lapwing wrote: they
cost a lot of money
Odyssey G7 or LG 850 from 45 thousand just laugh at your note. If you want a good, high-quality, juicy picture, matrix, pixel density, synchronization support, hertz - you lay out the money. Almost the same. I picked up a top-end monitor, and it's 10 grand cheaper than a TV.
MOSHIVURII lapwing wrote:
eyes get very tired
I don't. You need to choose a matrix for your eyes. And there will be happiness. These are not tube TVs, from which the eyesight sat down and got tired. An important aspect is that even in 10 years, TVs have taken a big step forward.
MOSHIVURII lapwing wrote:
you can easily see certain pixel flaws
, you can't see them at all. For the TV and the processor scale. NO PIXELS. Although I can see the grid, but at a distance - FAST!
MOSHIVURIA lapwing wrote:
In short, the TV is for movies and porn, and the monitor is for games.
I forgot the console. Bud the kosolschiki do not play. And TVs are just entering this world, I already threw off the video for you - 120Hz, 4k, matrix for 13 milliseconds, 100k is a question.
MOUSE lapwing wrote:
It takes four eyes to catch the girth of the picture so that you can control the ENTIRE gameplay.
Distance. You don't look up to me. If there is a good TV, there is also a rich living room with a console where I play with a joystick. And 43 inches is a pathetic 108 cm. Even a 32 monitor is 81 centimeters. Big difference? no.

01001000 01101001
What the fuck is 10 fps at most??? What am I talking about)))) Here is the first test I came across with 660. The resolution is full hd and the settings are average !!!!!!! The dude has hard drawdowns well below 60 fps. Therefore, if you run the latest version, even in 4k and on ultras - yes, damn it, it’s not that it won’t start, the computer will burn out from such a load !!!!

01001000 01101001 Spoiler
You are not capable of sarcasm at all. This same trolls writes - Potter? What do you want from him? And what do you want to prove to him? How to talk to him? Just like he does with you. Play in 4k, and cut screenshots in FullHD. Not pale at all. Everything is clear. And then I didn’t understand it right away)))) There were such sensations that both really seriously prove that 660 can 4k in Folych))))

01001000 01101001
I used to do photoshopping a long time ago and I can say that the photo is really professional. retouched and edited with subtle filters and layers of precision in facial plasticity. There is no other computer in the world to make such graphics in the game, like a game in some kind of 10k resolution. I mean, to have a comfortable FPS in a game with such a killer picture. And for that matter, even in the latest version of the game there is not even a close similar picture even on ultras.
Spoiler Although the chick is nothing like that. I would blow. And the rest of the guys too

01001000 01101001
Why do you show cosplay and write that this is a screenshot from the game?

potter790
potter790 wrote:
You set the resolution of a 4K monitor to 1080p, in DSR the resolution is up to 4K quality, in the game 1080p, and everything works fine, as a 4K picture
It's all bullshit, like console pseudo 4K. You turn on at least 2.5k through the driver and that's it settings to the maximum. Then you will see the real performance of your 960GTX. In urban areas where grass accumulates, even Daiemon City will seem like a fairy tale

Denis Kyokushin wrote:
In urban areas of grass accumulation, even Daiemon City will seem like a fairy tale
Spoiler
The performance is fake. )))

potter790
Your platform in a naked game at 2.5k at max will die.

Denis Kyokushin wrote:
Your platform in a 2.5k naked game at max will crash.
There are no problems in 4K, everything flies with a whistle. The only problem in 4K is flickering textures, especially the sky, and especially with the dark nights mod. This is the only problem that is absolutely unacceptable. Fall 4 is an old game, it doesn't have 4K at all.

potter790
You test it at least in 2.5k and put it here with all the indicators. I tested it yesterday and I can say with confidence that you don’t have any 4k

01001000 01101001
Sony - excellent hardware, but high imput lag, at least on the KD43X81JR version. He does not have a game mode.
There is a game mode there, then the seller is stupid or whoever is there, the input lag is within the normal range, but VRR and so on may not be DolbyVsision.
I kind of specifically talked about LG OLED c1 and not VA, there is G-Sync and 120Hz and VRR.
At Samsung, normal ones start from 80 pieces, this is like the Samsung Q70T, everything will be there, but again, the color rendition is to Sony and Panasonic.

potter790
Denis Kyokushin
if the maximum settings are 660, it should barely pull out a full HD 30 fps
https://gamegpu.com/rpg/rollevye/fallout-4-test-gpu.html
maybe there a friend tweaked the settings, for example, he drank volumetric fog, but then this is not max not interesting at all. and on 690, though with overclocked graphics and an active layer, I suffered from a lack of vram, finally from which I had to switch to 900r so that the game would not crash.

X_ray_83
X_ray_83 wrote:
input lag there is within the normal range
I personally saw it - it's just awful. Without a game mode, there is nothing to do there. Where in the description did you find the game mode? I'm currently watching the Samsung 9000 series. They write norms and percentages and a picture. And there is 1080p 120Hz.
For the price, this is the only option. You also need to rustle among LG - nano866, it's normal for the money, the issue of color reproduction. There are also philips models, without flashes a great picture, but I don’t know the input lag.
AU9000 also has amd Free Sync (works on nvidia cards). so, no such option.

I have the highest resolution on the TV set 4096x2160, of course I don’t turn it on, but Nvidia Upscaling starts to dance from it. And the picture is out of proportion.