Mankind accelerates the evolution of...
We all know that evolution since the dawn of the Solar system never stopped. For many millions of years under the influence of natural environmental factors there are a lot of organisms flora and fauna.Now in some countries started to carry out experiments on the combination of genes of different animals with the human genome.
Whether a person is able to accelerate millions of years of evolution?
How do you feel about the experimental production of a hybrid human?
Maybe soon will be a cat-girl?
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
I would like to know the answer to what it would...
Nothing good, if not thinking to do.
The hospital is useless unless the disease is something serious. So you need to look for other methods of treatment.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
speaking of the fittest, who is meant???
I mean those who can independently (i.e. without surgery, without daily doses of insulin and other drugs and procedures to compensate for congenital defects) to survive to reproductive age and have children.
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
why, in principle, then, to allow people with posiedzenie genes to have children?
Too radical method, and would have caused an uproar. In addition, the realities of modern Russia, given the corruption, nepotism, ethnic tensions, such a ban may well be used for the genocide of entire peoples. As in the neighboring Asian country (read an article about it, I don't remember exactly what, Tajikistan or Uzbekistan or what else) under the guise of fight against genetic defects sterilize unwanted people.
ColonelJason wrote:
This is very eloquently demonstrates the level of your alma-mater.
ColonelJason, my alma-mater is illustrated by the elimination of the consequences of the explosion at Chernobyl, the decontamination of the Semipalatinsk nuclear test site, complete disposal of chemical weapons in Syria and three countries, prevention of possible outbreaks of bacteriological character in the floods this year, and before that in the now well-forgotten Crimean and in the Amur region in 2013, plus a bunch of still top-secret operations around the world (e.g., chicanes Anton Utkin, a colleague of my mother at the fourth laboratory, where he developed domestic technology of destruction of chemical weapons, under a UN mandate have been looking for Saddam's weapons of mass destruction, but he is also still under subscription) and of course the great and terrible novice, og.
CpaHblN 4onNk
CpaHblN 4onNk wrote:
my alma-mater is illustrated by the elimination of the consequences etc.
The level of your personal competence and accomplishments eloquently demonstrates that any questions you answer with a list of achievements of the people, which (achievements) you personally do not have a relationship absolutely no. What a pity that mother's bowels gave you peace in a place so sparsely populated. Imagine what a magnificent scattering of wisdom would be a conversation with you if you were born somewhere in the more crowded region. I see it like this:
- But you at least three good books in my life read?
- PF, I I, people born in the same city as the Dostoevsky, to explain their literary tastes.
-You have an education-then what?
For my education speaks eloquently of the fact that I live in the city where he died Lomonosov.
And with a salary you like?
- Banner as a joke - live in the five metro stations from the street where is located the Central office Sberbank!
-You though can you drive?
-Listen, shame on you so interested? I have a Central square of the city of Gagarin on the car was cut off, and you say...
- And with his wife as?
- Ask. About Pushkin heard? It is the same. My countryman.
CpaHblN 4onNk wrote:
(for example, chicanes Anton Utkin, a colleague of my mother at the fourth laboratory, where he developed domestic technology of destruction of chemical weapons under a UN mandate have been looking for Saddam's weapons of mass destruction, but he is also still under subscription)
A separate item I was rushing like you the post to strangers on the forums for information about people whose activities are under a subscription about nondisclosure, but the same Flirty-disclosure are covered under the question about your post (although we realise that this answer is the secrets to be can no, and the values for state security has not the slightest). In General, suddenly became interesting: and would approve of your institution such volubility?
Pilat. wrote:
the reincarnation of grunge women in the male form multiplied by ***
Even afraid to imagine what lies behind the asterisks.
ColonelJason wrote:
The level of your personal competence and accomplishments eloquently demonstrates that any questions you answer with a list of achievements of the people, which (achievements) you personally do not have a relationship absolutely no. What a pity that mother's bowels gave you peace in a place so sparsely populated. Imagine what a magnificent scattering of wisdom would be a conversation with you if you were born somewhere in the more crowded region.
ColonelJason You, my friend, is a typical liberalist with broken to tatters by the mantra of first dobato! and other mrazota navarretia what, I suspect, is the root of Your impenetrable stupidity. Do you seriously believe that Higgs received the Nobel prize for boson own behalf, personally and opened it?? So I have to disappoint You - he first SUGGESTED the existence of the Higgs, and then, 40 years later, the boson DISCOVERED in the Tank of most OTHER PEOPLE, AND NO Nobel prize FOR THAT THEY have NOT RECEIVED, yeah. Same with uncle Einsteina - he received his Nobel prize for something then it is practically disproved quantum mechanics; and quantum mechanics has developed as a collective effort, not the achievement of the hero's single. Here team work we're still doing - it's clearly the best pastime, than Your circulation throughout Your liberactnoy Caudle on illegal rallies.
ColonelJason wrote:
A separate item I was rushing like you the post to strangers on the forums for information about people whose activities are under a subscription about nondisclosure, but the same Flirty-disclosure are covered under the question about your post (although we realise that this answer is the secrets to be can no, and the values for state security has not the slightest). In General, suddenly became interesting: and would approve of your institution such volubility?
ColonelJason, my friend, I give You the information exclusively from open access, nothing secret, I have not yet written, otherwise to me I would came and said ay-Yai-Yai, nizzzzya so, and then suddenly among these little dipshits are the one who has twice two is still four, and he suddenly understand everything! Subscription about nondisclosure Anton Yuryevich apply to its activities in GOSNIIOKHT, then his job as a UN expert in Iraq; everything else it perfectly and with expression told almost all Federal TV channels and almost all radio stations, including ear Mosvy. I do not speak, because Anton Titov was a developer and supervisor, and my colleagues and I worked with the final product, so we are aware of specific numbers and dosage - and it extends the subscription, remember for the future, and a better record. You see, at a certain stage is important, not the one who invented the weapon, and the one who can bring it to a stage suitable for use. Yes, I admit, if not for Anton Yurevich, Vladimir and Leonid I., we would not know what to do, but the end product worked we - we know Lope hang in grams, which in many situations is much more important and more critical to homeland security. And here this information I never will tell, yeah.
And now the most interesting: the name of the one who for the creation of the newbie got the State prize of Lenin Komsomol, NO one KNOWS, so the media laurels will never find this character - he life would be under a subscription and close surveillance of Russian secret services. So everything actually works, what would You and other homosexuals from may seem. But spasatelno for You I'll add a reference to Novaya Gazeta, for inspiration, so to speak, and You're already starting to repeat myself.
http://pressmia.ru/authors/ytkin_a
https://radiomayak.ru/persons/person/id/288540/
http://cyclowiki.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80_%D0%98%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87_%D0%A3%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BA,_%D0%9B%D0%B5%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B4_%D0%98%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87
https://news.rambler.ru/other/39760478-rodina-novichka-chem-zhivet-zakrytyy-gorod-rossiyskih-himikov/?updated
https://www.novayagazeta.ru/articles/2018/04/07/76098
CpaHblN 4onNk
CpaHblN 4onNk wrote:
You, my friend, a typical liberalist with broken to tatters by the mantra of first dobato! and other mrazota navarretia what, I suspect, is the root of Your impenetrable stupidity.
and Cho, you're with him vykat? hurting a lot of honor, you yourself wrote that he was stupid, he and you enough for the eyes. he's woodpecker. yeah, even the newbie really smelled like Samushia people (like you), and drat clever.
and these boys are your Anton Yurevich, Vladimir and Leonid I. is alive, and whether he died a heroic death?
never mind, protingas not yet take off your (the nurse then, probably forgot that dear boy looks), and then you never know...
CpaHblN 4onNk
CpaHblN 4onNk wrote:
You, my friend, a typical liberalist
CpaHblN 4onNk wrote:
Your circulation throughout Your liberactnoy Caudle on illegal rallies.
I'm sorry to interfere in the smooth flow of your sizofrenija nonsense, but as much as I was encouraged to contemplate as you expose yourself to ridicule, in response to all questions calling me wrong (in your opinion) the word liberal, forced to disappoint you - my attitude to our liberals, to put it mildly, skeptical.So, you'll have to invent a new dark TranSec sucked from his body sparkling insult, and have it repeat like a parrot nor, nor as a baby, a little underdeveloped.
CpaHblN 4onNk wrote:
with a broken to tatters by the mantra of first dobato!
What a rebuke, too, is totally unfair - all, I think, obviously, by your melovannoj of speech, and its schizophrenic content that you in my life has achieved nothing, and nothing will achieve. Accordingly, no one thought to tell you first bring- it is clear that this is not about you. You had to show the bare minimum of manhood,decency,and appropriateness in communication, and at least just try to justify their rudeness skotuvate. But, alas, the necessary inner qualities in you was not found.
CpaHblN 4onNk wrote:
then suddenly amongst these little dipshits are the one who has twice two is still four, and he suddenly understand everything
My God,do not get tired to admire your moral character! Again, don't forget the son to demonstrate their polemical achieve our humble forum. Isn't that sweet - a 50-year-old uncle came to a forum about video games, tell everyone what they're morons. What can I say: the man is a real man. Intelligent, decent, with sense of dignity. And most importantly, we see that the man held. After all, so behave successful, who achieved much in life people.
antonrogov wrote:
Too radical method, and would cause an uproar
Most likely, it would have been. However, sometimes practices contrary to ethics, but why is ethics power over rational and is the main? -)
For some reason, when there is a chemical or biological contamination of individual buildings in the city, the government could easily surround it and even shoot those who try to run outside. Without a trial shot point. And everything is fine... And then just a strategic method of rectifying the situation in the world or a particular state, and Gee, no, impossible! 8)
A. Soldier of Light
A. Soldier of Light wrote:
However, sometimes practices contrary to ethics
Flat bourgeois rationality (read - the usefulness, the practicality of maintaining a primitive form of existence) - Yes, probably. But no more. In all other cases, ethics is a criterion of reasonableness.
Gauguin
As I understand it, ethics you call your pripadajuce Pugachevoj people, the scope of which is outlined by your conjuncture tasks? Interesting interpretation. Do not share your opinion that we finalize the provision on the boundaries, depths, and positions of your ideas about ethics and the clergy , in the person of its individual members, in our anxious days all is well with ethics? We are simple people, ignorant, and you, as a person close to the case, must be aware of.
A fascinating and surprising conversation here. It is a pity that intelligent people don't fight on the subject, and about each other.
ColonelJason
You are a smart man, but why do You allocate intellectual development as a defining characteristic when the alleged artificial selection on reproduction? Intellectual development depends on the semantic environment, as it does not depend on genes, and not defined by them. You are clearly over-rating is influenced by my feelings to people.
CpaHblN 4onNk
You too are a smart man, but why are You so vehemently deny the research of anthropologists, geneticists and archaeologists? If You have data contrary to modern views of anthropologists on human development, then why not tell at least in General terms, in the context of this dispute?
GIGAVETER
GIGAVETER wrote:
Intellectual development depends on the semantic environment, as it does not depend on genes, and not defined by them.
The development of personality depends on the environment,and that is of fifty percent, and intellectual potential, as well as, for example, temperament is fifty percent of those that were determined genetically. Identical twins, separated at birth and raised in different environment, usually the same (very close to each other) level of intelligence. Such, at least, the data of modern psychology.
GIGAVETER wrote:
Intellectual development depends on the semantic environment, as it does not depend on genes, and not defined by them.
How is it depends on what kind of Marxism? It vzaimousilivat concepts. The environment certainly shapes the individual, but the environment is shaped by the people in the first place - their (genetically determined, as mentioned above) intelligence.
ColonelJason
Indeed, I wryly put it, tired probably wanted to say that development depends not only on genes but also on environment, but You do not have considered.
About the second objection is true, but only if it is about all people, for all time, an individual very little and rarely affected, and greatly depends on a number of outliers where, when, how, with whom and so on. Therefore, intelligence is dependent not only on genes, but from everything else as the main feature in the selection of the unfit, many healthy people will go into rejection.
GIGAVETER
GIGAVETER wrote:
and from the environment, but You do not have considered.
ColonelJason wrote:
the intelligence level of at least 50% determined by genetic factors
Right here pointed out that genetic determinism is not the only factor, and implicitly assumes that the second factor - environment.
GIGAVETER wrote:
unless you're talking about all the people, all the time, an individual very little and seldom affected
Absolutely all of the advances in science and in spiritual activities (literature, music, etc.) belong to any one individual. The broad masses of people do not contribute to the intensive development of science and culture, they are only extensively spread created units. In Economics there is the concept of demographic cycle. The point is that adult educated (hypothetically) a person acquires offspring and investing resources in their education, in order to support the reproduction of the human resource. In practice, we have that the majority of people not only to transmit to posterity their own unpromising terms of mental abilities, genes, and do not invest enough resources (because of their absence) in their education, i.e. to create the very environment of which you are aiming. Precisely to combat last circumstance, and directed my concept that you interpret incorrectly, saying that the selection will take place on intelligence. The selection will rely on how I text and said,
ColonelJason wrote:
property qualifications on the birth of a child
I.e., any person with little bit to adapt to the surrounding realities and to apply a particular favor (or at least quality entertainment) mankind will be able to successfully live and reproduce in this society. Not going anywhere neither athletes, nor musicians, nor buses, nor, to my regret, even literary criticism. Even telemarketers will remain, although personally I would aluminiowa them all, but as you can see, my system is fair and impartial. But Imbeciles, do not do anything at all, but a mushrooming of 8 children doomed to a bestial, often criminal existence will be eliminated and the point. I think you just don't know how many people in the world today, and how fast they reproduce. You probably imagine my concept aimed at the extermination of rustic Russian electrician, but this is not so.
GIGAVETER
But if you follow the thread question, then how the human body evolved?
Became tougher, there's resistance to disease, mental development is higher?
After all, if the person with the intellectual capacity not the will to develop it,he will remain a fool.
And if so will develop, he will be the offspring, not the fact that this offspring will be the same intellectual potential as the ancestor.
And at the expense of intellect, and take the child of ancient man in this time and train him intellectually, he will not differ from current humans.