What fps you consider to be minimally comfortable in games?
For me personally the shooters - at least 60. Although Far CRy 3 games with 40, first slightly lacked the feelings, but in two hours used.But in action from 3 persons all very different. For example, if the same Batman Arkham Origins sometimes feel uncomfortable there, but when measuring it turned out - 60-70 fps, recently played Assassin's Creed Brotherhood (all smooth, macho, without lags and freezes), I decided to measure fps nothing better to do - turned out to be 35-40. But feel how all 60.
And you have been so? Play and think - flies, and measure - BAM - 30 fps. And Vice versa, it seems like slows down and fps in the hundreds.
dennismiza wrote:
And you have been so? Play and think - flies, and measure - BAM - 30 fps.
Seems to me you are a bit of snickering, comrade ^_^ 30 fps he is already the help, all is lost! )
Bloodymurder wrote:
will not notice the difference...
It is better to Express the thought necessary. And that 24 fps the eye does not see... he does not see that? FPS is not an object, and not 24 more than a number of excellent indicator frames per second. What to the frames themselves, we see more than 24 frames, but feel completely unable to tell the difference between 30 and 60, for example. If you can't, others do not say ;]
N3r3vator666
If you don't see the difference between 24 frames and 60, then you have problems with vision. And do not care that the post 2015-year
For me comfort - 60+
PC - 30,45
Console - 25,30.
60,50 it is already smooth and nice to play for me.
25-30 fps for me is the minimum for quite a comfortable game. Was playing GTA 5 with 9-29 fps was noticeable enough, but the campaign mode however went through.
WANTED174
Over 100 fps. On a 144 Hz monitor, the picture is very smooth.
Then there must be more than 144 fps if 144 Hz is played. And if you have a higher 100 Hz, it is necessary to put gartsovku 100 Hz.
1. Exhibited a stable ( not floating ) 40 FPS using Riva Tuner Statistics Server.Therefore, the game is stable, and PC components do not overheat. In determining this, the FPS was experimenting with FPS from 30 to 70. Practical experience is not understood whether there is any difference. Of course, theoretically, and while particular reference to certain qualities, there is a difference.
2. In Russian television is interlaced with a refresh rate 25, 30. We look at the idiot box and don't think about it.
3. FPS is one of the main indicators when testing graphics cards. But under the influence of this information was the dogma that the more real FPS, so is it better in the game. Will lead at least one antithesis. If not to limit, FPS is sure to be a swim due to the limit mode ( performance ) components. That is, the inability of data processing per unit time is expressed in the automatic lowering of FPS. Hence overheating, bugs, lags, hangs.
Tip:
a) if you are satisfied, do not chase the FPS as an end in itself.
b) if you see a real improvement of the game, then it's up.
C) well if you have supertehnikoy, all the cards in his hands. For this purpose it was acquired.
It all depends on the system. We are not comparing 30 and 60 fps right now. the author of the question apparently means a drop in FPS. If we are talking about a fall in FPS, then it is comfortable at 45-50, up to 40 is already annoying, about 30 - reluctantly, and 25 and below - this is self-flagellation as for me