Haythem Kenway (Assassin's Creed 3)
More than the main character Connor...? Well no, of course the main character is always evident, because we played it, but in fact Hatem received at least a step more charismatic and interesting than Connor. Hatem he was, despite everything, to find common ground and solve their differences. But Connor chose another way - to kill all who disagree with him... So will not go far in life. Well, although what is there to wonder after Connor killed his best friend all became clear, direction of play and with the future plot... it Became clear that a primitive need of all is to go and destroy in its path, literally everyone who will be with you just do not agree, until for the time being will not go the credits... And that he killed Huitema is not altogether surprising, after the murder of the best friend where to go to retreat? In General, it is certainly the developers ' idea, not for me to argue with their right to decide how it will be in the game, though it's mush solid Hardcore. I just think it would be possible to do without killing Huitema, and just, like, disappear him at the end of the game from the main plot, so to speak the gap, and then a good continuation to think about Connor and the same Hateme... And I think people would like that, people would more approved than the way they did... but who knows again, maybe the way they did is the best option...And yet Haythem Kenway as a character, I think me and you will be remembered for all time, unlike Connor, who will appear in memory only due to the fact that the core gameplay and attention in this part involved him in greater degree than to the same Hatimu. But it does not mean that Connor was the best character ...
And still I liked the game, each part of the Assassin I accept as a gift from a high-quality gaming industry, still worked well and they had everything. In General, I personally rated the game 9 out of 10. Because of the wealth of a good ending concerning Desmond and the real time - one point in my eyes was lost, so to speak... Yes, but everything else I was very pleased, and the music composed by Lorne Balfe impressed, however, than wrote it in the previous parts of Jesper Kyd. So the game is worthy of attention anyway. Everyone will find something for themselves, especially those who passed the first part...
Hatem a great character,and I would say the best complier which I saw in something even liked it more than Connor.
Haithem is a real contrast to Connor. If Connor is Indian, which is still new to this advanced civilization, are unfamiliar with its order, but rather honest and even naive. And Haithem was raised in an aristocratic family in London, knows the trick of society and himself is pretty tricky, but charismatic and always behaves with dignity (even in death). They're both great characters, and I don't even know who I like. Probably both.
Treshcore97
I Hatem liked the fact that it is the only Templar who did not say MUCH. He immediately made it clear his goal. But it is not the most pleasant person in the game, but not the last.
Fahrenheit3640
Read all the posts...I Agree and Hatem really like a character and people like it more than Connor....In the game there were many moments about their relationship and I can say one thing - Hatem recognized Connor as his son,Connor, in turn, recognized him as his father,was seen more as an enemy of the Templar and Oh, how it does not paint the main character....Hatem often turned to Connor as a son and the word Son and my son...maybe I'm wrong of course,but I haven't seen in Connor's attachment to the father, or thrust, although it might cut down Hercules, their views are adopted Connor.
Mirazentik
Thanks, I'm pleased for your work invested in this topic. About what you wrote, I will say the following: 'connor called Hatama - father campaign game, but it doesn't have to mean... not that you measure the love of a man so obviously not in it... and it became clear at the end of the game.
Haithem is certainly good,but how low his moral character if he allows his friends to torture her even but an illegitimate son,and quietly resolves to execute his own blood and himself in the end with a knife thrown.Cold-blooded and rotten soul type explicitly.
Hatem a great character, confident and a natural leader. Is moderately tough. He has much in common with his son. In addition, Hatem not conspicuous as a Templar. His goal was not that of tamplierov of the middle Ages, for example. A temporary Union Hatama and Connor is pretty funny, though Hatem, IMHO, and has no right to dispose of Connor as a son. These characters are similar, their goals too. But differences arise at every step. About the War, about Washington. But both characters I liked. But the goal Connor, slightly higher than the target Hateme. Connor fought for the freedom of his people and the whole of America. And Hatem was going to quietly rule the actions of people to create the perfect world once said al-Mualem.
HeythamEK
Maybe so, decide how it is the prerogative of the developers and the players still build their guesses and assumptions...
Hello! my opinion about Chatime is: he is aristocratic, and even your anger he viraat dzhentelmenski remember at the beginning on the ship? and vobshe not much I liked into the main hero Indian but this is wrong! I aficionados of the series and assasins creeed Ezio gets really polutshe Conor! I vobshe aficionados etsio) but the 3rd not possible to call a reasonable and brilliant but the ship struck me (in the best way) of okonchatelnyy verdict in my opinion) assasins 3. good but not the best of the series assasins! but something to go with those coming back from Conor) honestly it annoys me a bit as well can beat the main hero of the Indian ? in the head did not go well vobshem Conor I am not very well, that's my verdict)
GoKe3421
Or am I really paranoid, or you - Troll? It's not an insult, but merely a question. In cases of paranoia, I will say this: I do not think that the success of the main character of the series lies exclusively in his race, I am more than confident that we can take any person, any race, and present the character so that any other popular race in the film industry or in another industry - will dissolve and break to pieces the stereotypes of such a plan, present you... All depends on the ability and desire to present it, here is another question. Most people prefer to be based on proven methods - fear, something to put forward their own, to go against the established opinions, and in fact this is the main error that any person who is going to succeed in their difficult task that wants to stand out, never stand out - if you will follow - an inveterate stereotypes.
After reading the posts, I was under the impression that some have not followed the story in AC3. You judge Connor that he is a dumb sheep that does not respect the credo, etc. But remember the beginning when he talked with Juno she told him that if you do not remove the Templars, they will open the temple and all write-was gone. And that's the main point of this movie she said something like this: while Maintaining the chosen course (inaction) of your village will be destroyed! And it is those words made Connor's stupid to kill the Templars. And they are right or not, this is roughly to f*** because it was his SEM*I, i.e. a village. The point is that Juno said that will survive at least one kapets village. This is the reason he mindlessly killed the Templars. Haithem character certainly colorful but has a major flaw - he underestimates opponents and specifically his son for which he paid with his life. Only do not say that Haithem didn't want to kill, and so on.
In the Church he didn't kill him because he was interesting to watch Connor and he harbored a very strong paternal feelings for, and at Fort Connor he was wounded, so to say that the father has spared the son, too, is wrong the chances were equal. And then manifested a lack of Hatemi - he underestimated his son and was killed. He and Connor didn't want to kill his father but remembering the prophecy of Juno he accomplished this act. And what we got in the end, when Connor killed all and went back to Juno?
She lied to Connor, not saying that at the end of this krestovogo campaign the village will be destroyed. On the contrary said that it would save her. If she would have told Connor that in the beginning he would have tried to find another solution and not kill the Templar. Maybe he would even together with Hateman would create a utopia but I doubt it......
zzzprizrakzzz
And mindlessly killed his best friend, and despite the fact that at first he apparently didn't have goals to kill Huitema, he took and killed him, that is, it was not because he needed whatever was to kill him, but because he couldn't cope with the situation And just... I'm sorry, does it seem possible that Juno could manipulate the mind of Connor, knocking him all anxious predictions which would cause his brain to shut down in some moments and to kill friends and father... I vaguely remember this command of Juno, but never took him seriously, as he realized that she was lying, that it's not for Connor's sake, and for their own personal motives of this ancient civilization that supposedly still lives... So even if it comes to that, the stupidity of Connor still evident, as he believed anyone who says that his village may be saved, not seeing at close range, he collaborated with the true murderers of his family...
Maybe the topic is already jaded enough to pick it up, but I have a logical question arises: And not Connor whether it was wounded heaviest then in the Fort? If Hatem was wounded slightly, in comparison with wounds of Connor, he really was in sound condition, and Connor even disoriented for a while, you'll remember yourself... I agree, Hatem obviously with him not playing, but that doesn't mean that he wanted to kill him at any cost, maybe he took him with his grip if only to teach, but it turned out that Connor took it and shook, took and thrust a blade, killing the man with whom you could negotiate. That's what I have perhaps the most intense indignation, to the fact that Connor committed the action, when they can be solved with words, and it is a sign of weakness, in a certain way.
Fahrenheit3640
I agree with you in respect of the murder of a friend it was possible to act differently, for example to stun him and then as it to clarify the situation, I missed this point, thanks for reminding me.
About Hatem say so. Connor why did you come to the Fort? To find Charles Lee and to kill him, but there he met father and that if I'm not mistaken said that If this is the future and that will not give it so happened this battle.
In the end, Connor had even suggested to his father(and I quote) Sdaisa, and I will spare you. And in response to said Haithem Bold words for the dying. That is, he planned to kill his son plus at the beginning he wanted to pierce Connor's hidden blade but Connor couldn hurt his wrist so what about the wounds we can say that Hatem had one hand which he fought, and the wounded Connor, and on this basis we can say that Connor may was more injured than his father.
To be honest I was expecting that during the strangulation of her son Haithem suddenly let him go and tell the vet what I was doing wrong, etc. it's not even a key was pressed the attack in the process of strangling Connor, But as one Ukrainian proverb Not become Yak gadaleta.
In conclusion I will say that Connor's character is ambiguous which causes us to think but is it right?(Unlike Ezio) and I think it is important in character to encourage to reflection.
PS Vs Ezio have nothing against he's my favorite character of the series, and Altair.
zzzprizrakzzz
Here, you yourself agreed that Hatem was more seriously wounded than Connor. Look, I don't think the words bold words for the dying sounded like now after this he him in any way obliged to kill, it was the most arrogant response Khatema that way I do not really welcome in it. You know, to guess is useless to discuss all of this, because the developers decided to remove Hatama, they would have it removed anyway, but to clean itself effectively - don't bother. It was their business, but to remove it so it was a low blow to players who Hatem already managed to catch the fancy of...
Fahrenheit3640
But Haytem during the game for him was a Templar. And when we're playing for Connor, he is a Master. So he anyway had to die.
And what about the Connor - he did everything to protect his people, and then to give freedom to America. Freedom - that's what he fought for. And I agree with him. The Templars anyway had to die as Hatem - remember previous games in the series! Altair was ordered to kill 9 targets. Ezio took revenge for the death of his father and brothers, and then destroy Templiers was his duty. But Connor also took revenge. His eyes were his mother died, the village was burning. He was sure that If I ran. And he began to retaliate, and seeing as the British oppressed the Americans, he began to expel them from the country. When it seemed to George Washington, Connor took his side, seeing that he too is fighting for freedom.
HeythamEK
Uh, why do I think you have written all this without reading half of it in this thread? Of course it is your right, I don't blame. But, just a bit silly when you have to answer the same questions or statements, different people. That's right, Connor was sure Whether ran it and in the end, who was controlling it all? Not George Washington who crossed Connor? Who then do you think - did/have done the right thing in this story, Connor, or Haythem?
Fahrenheit3640
Do the right thing Connor. But not George.
And we know how Connor in his youth was naive, believing that his enemies will believe him. Connor acted recklessly, trusting to Washington, but he did the right thing, helping him - in fact did it for the country.
And Hatem not sided with neither the Continental Army nor a Crown. I agree with him that George is not the most confident person, but there is a matter of principle. Hatem defended him, knowing that Washington supports the struggle. Although Hatem, it seemed, was FOR the independence of America.
I mean, CONNOR was protecting Washington. ) A small disclaimer.
By the way, Washington I particularly liked only in the role of the tyrant king.
HeythamEK
Do you think that America's war for independence culminated in the most that neither is the best order of things? Understand this fact, the developers themselves put into the fire the oil - questioning of Washington, and showing Haitima with a good hand. I agree, he, like everyone else - was and bad sides, some things I strongly disagree with Hatamim, BUT for this, I wanted Connor has teamed up with Hatamim, it would not hurt to both of them, both of them...
They have to ally the time... but sometimes it seems that each of them plans to murder each other. Let, Connor didn't even want to kill his father, but Achilles said, if I am not mistaken, this can not be avoided. When the relationship between the father and son is strained, and between them was Connor continued the work of his life, and Hatem also fought for her. In the end, Connor escaped, killing his father. But remember the last words of Hateme: I should've killed you before. . That made me think...