The CryEngine 3 game engine (Crysis 2)
So, who's for the continuation will be on the Unreal Engine 3, raise your hands.*Raised hand*
I think CryEngine 3, Frostbite go large in pálné of graphics and in terms of optimization and universality of the engine!
your opinion?
In optimization - certainly. But for her the game had almost no physics. Promised destructible - received only a couple of buildings, which can dislodge the glass.
Frostbite 2 was not able to test. Box with license BattleField 3 so it is not the case. In Crysis 2 I play on extreme settings (without DX11 and HD), and in BF3 I could not and at a minimum.
Alpha_Regenerator, Here's a similar situation . Try to not get Frostbite due to some strange error in Battlefield 3 .Well Cry Engine 3 is not bad.
Strange many people say that Battlefield 3 is the coolest on the chart . I just have not played it and I can not compare.
BF3 will be better. And performance he is taller and a designer, and what there lighting.... Hmmm)) Well, there's someone that likes both the engine is very decent and will be relevant for another 3-4 years.
many say that Battlefield 3 is the coolest on the chart-they Say that chickens are milked, we let go of Boobs not found.
CRYENGINE 3
for me CE3 steeper, the more FB2, I have never seen as many here know because of what...
I'll try to make the most accurate result among the comparison engines.
So, let's proceed
A lot of people when comparing the graphics on the engine, CE3 and Frostbite, compares the schedule Krayzisa 2 and 3 Battles, but...
in Battlefield 3 graphics better than in Krayzise 2, but in fact, in skilled hands, CryEngine 2 does wonders, and frostbite this is not then, and indeed frostbayt reminds a bit skriptovani version of the engine, rather than freedom of action...
It seems to me that developed has been neglected for krayzis 2, here s why many believe that in the first krayzise graphite better, but the engine first krayzisa manifestly not even 50% of that can be done on CryEngine 3