I'm the king of cons? Or what is wrong with people
All the usual greetings, visitors of talk. In General, I noticed there is a problem, Yes, that's the problem, so boiling for the last time and now I'll try to interpret what bothers me, not bothers, and worries. Usually, I would say I do not care for it, but still I began to notice that people are sometimes weird and acting like selfish.So, recently I noticed that I was very much less, almost any topic, and in any case. What I did not write this zaminusyat, even if I write the truth, for example that on Windows it is better to disable the update, because there are updates that it is better not to install, and still people do less, I write what I like - minus, but the other person writes the same thing and it did not minus, what is it? mass hatred or is it some kind of conspiracy against me. Then write me a PM I bot some warp, who is he anyway I thought? But then I read the blogs and realized that there is a person, that's how I expressed my opinion and massively throw mud, but I'm still a different person and different from him not only his opinion, but also other flavors. So please guys, stop confusing me with that person, I beg you. I'm not going to adjust to anyone's attention, but I would have to earn the benefits, I do not have, I'm working on my principle, what I think, I say. And I'm not going to throw the iPhone crap just to adjust someone and make pros, I'm not corrupt, and these people now is not enough
Now the question is, how do you feel about these people who bear you a grudge due to the fact that you expressed your point of view, and how do you feel about the karma + or - ?
Grafen wrote:
Sometimes I write something suitable...
Are you sure about this? Fit for you.
Grafen wrote:
...and put the cons anyway
Not the fact that fit going to be the same for others.
Well this is pluralism, his mother, dig-dig. And you're offended...
Vanya Rygalov wrote:
Are you sure about this? Fit for you.
No. Most agree, but not all
v1806v
It ain't working buddy)). But put a beautiful girl :)
Vanya Rygalov wrote:
Well this is pluralism, his mother, dig-dig. And you're offended...
Dude, I do not offended anyone here, it's the Internet not real life.
Grafen
:
Most agree, but not all
Most? Which of these things should be? Or have you just decided for himself that most of your writings fit?
Lad, and are you familiar with concepts such as bragging or bragging?
SkyRaider
And you also do not understand that it is not karma, but the number of people who don't agree with what they agree.
Vanya Rygalov wrote:
Or have you just decided for himself that most of your writings fit?
My writing is not good, but try to write more normal things
Grafen
My writing is not good
Hallelujah! Happened. Finally it came.
...but try to write more normal things
Again, again the new? Criteria of normality are all different too. I'll try to explain easier.
The thing is the fact.
Bad, normal, excellent... - its evaluation.
You put your writings (thing) for everyone to see.
The audience reads and evaluates. Writes, bullshit, okay, genius... You are appreciated. Not you yourself put assessment and other.
Comprendo?
grafonoman
I am familiar with many concepts, even those which you do not suspect.
Vanya Rygalov
Vanya Rygalov wrote:
You put your writings (thing) for everyone to see.
Seriously? As if I didn't know that, why would America open?)
Vanya Rygalov wrote:
The thing is the fact.
So I write on the fact that I am satisfied and not satisfied, what's the problem?
Grafen wrote:
but the number of people who don't agree with what they agree.
It's something with something.
Vanya Rygalov
I am familiar with many concepts, even those which you do not suspect Vanysek, it doesn't make you smarter
Givemethedust
I meant that I do not agree with my opinion that for example the game is good, zaminusili my comments, and do write down that the game is good. Logic AU