The biggest failure of the decade? (Cyberpunk 2077)
Eight years of waiting for the reference RPG turned into 15 hours of interactive kinza with bugs and linear dialogues. Isn't that a failure, gentlemen?Kaskad131 wrote:
Are you asking me?
Rhetorical / thinking out loud. The plot addon would gladly run, but why go to the cartoon in KP2077 - I can't imagine.
About how the game feels - I don't think that something will change much over time. Actually, I don't know a single game in which something was noticeably "finished" with patches or radically improved or reworked.
saa0891 wrote:
spent so much effort .. to make an open world (at least made it smaller but more elaborate and interesting)
+. A compact world would only do good.
origami killer
Well, let's see how it will look. I can't even imagine myself yet. As they say: wait and see
Limauni has
already played for 20 hours, the only bug is the reflection in the mirror, when the character is wearing a headdress, it is reflected as bald. Where did you get all these bugs, do you invent them or what?
polyhedral
Psychology of children on the Internet, the computer does not pull the game - I will obserat, eventually I myself will believe that the game is shit, not so insulting that I could not play.
In short, I thought a little here, but alas, only those who have a powerful device, 3070-3080 +, can normally appreciate the game, Alas, but this is the first game that sends holders of medium cards on one erotic walking journey. The game is more built on all sorts of visual buns, and if these buns are removed, it turns into a soap shit. I have no complaints about the plot and narration, there are many questions to everything else. The game was definitely not a failure of a decade, but due to the poorest technical state of a game of this magnitude, aaa class games, the game had a lot of ill-wishers, and it definitely rubbed its pedestal, and it could go down in history, not only as a well-paid game in the first day, as well as a very good and amazing game, but alas, the first impressions are already ruined.
z8TiREX8z
z8TiREX8z wrote:
alas, only those who have a powerful device, 3070-3080 +
I have 3080, will be able to properly evaluate the game . I already wrote above that I bought powerful hardware for the release of the game, on purpose. Trust me, even a powerful device does NOT rid you of a huge number of bugs, does not make the poor graphics better. I am silent about optimization. In the game settings, there are branded gadgets from nvidia, but for a stable 50 frames and above they must be disabled! Rave!
sobakovod Xs
what and how you play. I grabbed everything with a full bouquet. Starting from the failure of cars and blah constantly something freezes on the screen. That window from the dialogue runs after me until you restart it. That description is freezing in the right corner. Twice I had to start from the beginning because it broke the quest line and there was no way to play further.
Well, really a scribe. I am generally silent about the empty world. There are four stores worldwide. Gear, mods, weapons and bottles of alcohol are all priced at 30 credits.
roonu
And they do not play, this is a bot or a troll and people like him have met in large numbers, they write that they have everything on their calculator at ultra at 60 FPS, just don't pay attention
gameworld
What?
I finished the game for the first time without any critical bugs that did not interfere with playing. There were no sinks for textures, flying cars, etc.
Began to pass a second time. bugs appeared in replicas, some models were in the air. Well, what is in the internet, I did not notice at myself I
played 51 hours.
on the 1660ti, I quietly twisted the settings to full. In the city by car, below 40 does not really fall, in some moments, of course, it is about 35 fps, but in most cases I always have above 50 fps. (but I manually disabled the graphic functions that I did not need, reduced some shadows to medium ones, which do not really change anything, additional functions). You can achieve 60fps
with a similar move.This is all with fullhd
Yes, this is not an ideal FPS, logically it should be clearly higher.
roonu
In order to justify CDPR, I will say that this is a new engine, yes, it is terribly buggy, NPCs zhahaya if you go to the sidewalk, in general, it's far from GTA in this regard, but still the graphics are excellent (rtx 3090), physics is lame, to the flesh when a collision on a motorcycle with a car can end up flying across the entire map to the other end of the night city, but I went through the main plot and do not regret it! + side quests are done very well, each quest, as it were, logically complements the main line and at the same time creates a mini story inside the story, the characters are quite charismatic, some even sink into the soul. Of course, the ending did not go very well, but that I spent 4 days almost without interruption I do not regret games! It's worth it, 7/10. -3 points for engine flaws
I love cyberpunk theme. What do not write - put cons.
Write - the game is shit, it will be a plus =)
Kaskad131
Objectivity has always been appreciated, and honesty is even more)))
You write the truth, objectively, in essence, and people perceive it positively. And hypocrisy, lies, nonsense and other lies always cause a negative, just like a purely subjective opinion that goes against the generally accepted norm)))
Kaskad131 wrote:
You write - the game is shit, it will be a plus =)
Due to the fact that the game is really shit. Perhaps it will someday be fixed to a suitable level, but the reputation has already been tarnished, and gamers, fortunately, people with a very good memory are <vindictive>)))
Coronavirus wrote:
just like a purely subjective opinion that runs counter to the generally accepted norm)))
Namely, that "going against the generally accepted norm."
I don’t know who and what was expecting such a superb one and what this expectation was based on. The game is quite normal, except for the bugs. And then not so scary. So far, I have encountered only one bug, it was installed an implant before meeting with Victor. Many games came out with even bigger bugs. But this did not make them worse.
And I still don't understand the main thing from the critics. WHAT BODUN THIS GAME IS COMPARED WITH THE WITCH ???? By the way, the Witcher also had bugs.
Leo1968
Leo1968 wrote:
By the way, the Witcher also had bugs.
There were. And no one denies this, but let's compare how long it took to make both games and how many times they moved.
Leo1968 wrote:
And I still don't understand the main thing from the critics. WHAT BODUN THIS GAME IS COMPARED TO THE WITCH?
The game was made by the same studio, that's why they compare.
The Witcher 3 Announcement date
February 5, 2013
Release date May 19, 2015
Cyberbook Announcement
date May 30, 2012
Release date December 10, 2020
The release of The Witcher 3 was postponed 2 times, the release of Cyberpuck was postponed 4 times. One of which, according to the official statement of the developer, is for optimization and bug fixing. Somewhere in this thread, one person briefly and in detail described all the transfers and motivations on the part of the developer, you can search. He was indignant there that these hands announced the dispatch of the game for "gold". The cyberbook was made 3 times longer than The Witcher, 2 times more The Witcher was postponed, but the bugs in the release version were 10 times more. In addition, I do not remember that in the release version of The Witcher it was necessary to disable proprietary nvidia gadgets on its top cards. The same hairworks AA could be safely set to the maximum. But in cyberbook for stable (pitiful!) 50+ frames, you have to turn off all nvidia gadgets, and even turn off the vertical. Turn off the vertical, Karl!
Coronavirus
Objectively? When you objectively describe your opinion, pluses, what you personally liked, saying that yes, there are big problems, but all this is being corrected Nobody likes it anyway, because supposedly your opinion does not agree with others, this is already some kind of problem, problem with society
Lies? If the game on my pc is going well, yes, not perfect, but playable, without any of the problems that they write about here. I have nothing to do? To sit and think that everything is fine, the game is perfect - buy. I see everything myself and say what I see and feel. If someone does not like it, then this is his business
When cyberpunk was announced, it was only in the minds of the developers, there were some art and nothing else, but after a while they began to develop it. (I suppose that was so, the stump is clear, one cannot say for sure about this)
Enough to talk about the development time ... well, this is a weak argument, seriously. For the first few years, how many people were there doing this game? The whole emphasis was on the witcher. After the witcher, everyone had already switched to cyberpunk. They even wrote about it. I'm even sure that the game was rewritten many times, altered and generally began to develop fully, clearly several years before the release, The
Witcher 3 was developed on the basis of parts 1 and 2, they already had experience with the witcher, they knew what was needed and what was not needed, therefore, the development period is short. Well, you don't see the obvious, but
Light of Eternity
I don't care, honestly. I just made sure of this once again, that's all. The previous comment will minus right now, check
On the PG, after all, how if you are in a trend, you will receive pluses, and if you are against the trend, deign to see the red numbers)
Modnov
Respect for such a detailed analysis, did not go very far because lags, bugs and in general, somehow not very much, and now I completely stopped wanting to go through. Even in B3 there was a lot more variability. Hell, even in B2 it was at least some, especially if you play for different sides.
StalkerShuha
Here I agree, yes, the illusion of choice. Which pissed me off more. There are supposedly many choices, But it all comes down to one, lol of course. I hope they will tweak something with the additions. Well, the main team is short in itself, there are side effects, but a couple of interesting things. and that for 50 hours mb is enough for you