Nvidia vs AMD (ATI) v.27

DartMaul
Yeah, haven't seen anything yet?

warp 37
Well, Yes. Apparently, 2 GB of memory and limit for give her about 3 GB would be even more interesting. In General, an interesting map is this, somehow I do not regret that took it.
The fact that identify from updated 270. He inappropriately acted in half the games, and worked only one card. And 270 in the same Batman does not play much... So we had to replace it crossfire. It turns out there really is a 3-5% difference, but the higher the stability, so many games got +50%.

Tellery Spyro-Cynder Mix, so I don't quite understand you 285 changed or brother bought a 290?

And someone has Fury X, someone has a happy owner ?

warp 37
Brother bought a 290 to replace crossfire of 270ых who behaves inappropriately in half the games.
I'm happy with my 285 for the eyes! Because most likely sell a few 270ых. with:

Tellery Spyro-Cynder Mix well if to replace the two 270 - a good buy. Two heads are better than one is definitely not your average cards.

Although, perhaps if he has a Core i5-i7 or FX-8320 was the acceleration, the difference would be tangible.

Tellery Spyro-Cynder Mix
Life is full of new discoveries.
Especially if the right test (isolating the test object from other factors, in order not to create third-party bolnici), and to understand what hardware is where, what, and when rests. Game tests in principle can not serve as a measure of performance of graphics.

As for specific numbers (which are apparently obtained by eye with an accuracy of +/- km) - a little.

PS test on different systems is generally final. There are some settings of the software can give up to 5% of the difference. Not to mention the different versions of fire wood, axes, a bunch of possible trash and so and so.

DartMaul
Computers ten feet away from each other, the configuration is 90% identical. Well, Yes, Windows second PC still the same, but special. cut down all sorts of Casper, Raseri, and other... the Wood is the same.

Well, course 285 290 physically faster, I think if you ask the same photoshop with my fun add-ins - the difference is manifest.

As for specific numbers (which are apparently obtained by eye with an accuracy of +/- km) - a little.
Fraps, and Samarka Incentive. Okay?

warp 37
Well, it's needless to say, we realized this six months ago.

FX-8320 was the acceleration, the difference would be tangible
Play ROG-motherboard though. with:

Tellery Spyro-Cynder Mix
The question of accuracy of measurements. Cards that you testite inherently I personally do not care for a gram, I even have my pair 290Х ceased to impress through an hour and a half after purchase. But the testing methods I care about.

Fraps, and Samarka Incentive. Okay?
The question how to measure no matter if not previously provided constant algorithm with constant length and complexity.
And Yes, Fraps is +/- a kilometer, if not to write a special benchmark in fashion but then additional softinos not to parse the log on the frame rate.

Tellery Spyro-Cynder Mix
Crysis 3 testi there is strained on all fronts from graphics card to CPU

X_ray_83
Okay.

Is it worth to buy r9 390 is PECs 970, if the first cheaper, the second two thousand.?

LightColorWave
If cheaper by 2K, that is, their performance on the same level.

Is it worth to buy r9 390 is PECs 970, if the first cheaper, the second two thousand.?
If nere-that is,if both Ref,that is an extreme case of saving money,be loud and hot.

If cheaper by 2K, that is, their performance on the same level.
r9 390 is slightly more powerful than the 970,but generally not after the first and the second(of naref)-can for 1 minute to put in msi afterburner frequencies up to the performance the gtx 980 or very close to it(how lucky).

In General, the faster r9 390 r9 290x or stupid rerendering?

7Rain7
the characteristics of the chip like one and the same as 290. however, the chip can be reworked and the map is actually another

MunchkiN 616
Yeah I was just wondering, to change sewed on soap I'm obviously not going to.

Collected my PC in early July 2013 year. The config I had this: i5 3470, 4gb RAM, Sapphire Radeon HD 7870 2gb. I don't know why not undestanding that I put immediately 7900 series (7950 is the same), but then I am too poorly versed in the gland. In all these 2 a little over a year I have problems with the video card did not arise. What I wrote this series often gets defective and there was 7850,7870 there are defects in the games. Don't know what they have there, but I'm fine with the video card, PAH-PAH-PAH. Then you need a different question to put, because Green is more expensive, but CONSIDERED SAFER, and the Red - cheaper, but somehow they are considered less reliable than Nvidia. Personally, at the 2013 I wanted to take the gtx 650, which was on a level with my Sapphire Radeon HD 7870 and I was told that it is better just to add, and feel free to collect serious hardware. Tell me, I don't know what tags were then, but 7870 or gtx 650? Naturally, performance will be 7870 anyway. So I do not see sense to overpay for Green, because it is possible for the same money can get a more powerful graphics card in Red. It's the principle, just, someone is a supporter of Nvidia cards, but someone AMD cards.

dobroczynski!please answer me 1 moment-why right now I'm playing shadow of Mordor with ultra(including the hd ultra textures which SUPPOSEDLY requires at least 6 GB of VRAM while I only have 3.5)-in performance test the average fps of 87.87 Carl!in the game 0 lag,so where is the lack of video memoryabout which you so fanatically crowed to the Reds?I don't oshaweb no shortage of game on ultra flies all cool)

dobroczynski,get proof they're in the documents folder and there the log of the benchmark you spices filled,tyzh only to believe the proof acoba) rghost.ru/65Yl6chcX

W3aMisterWinner
If your brain has done more than 8 classes and was able to think even slightly to read,not wrote you here this drivel not crowed so hard,but who am I?)))

Now,what did you mean by that?
Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (4352 MB) this for example?
Game Resolution: 1920 x 1080
UI Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Max FPS: Unlocked
OR IS THIS
Frame, FPS, Time (ms), System Memory Usage (MiB)
0, 104.88, 9.54, 1808.39
1, 84.99, 11.77, 1811.22
2, 37.74, 26.50, 1808.88
3, 77.51, 12.90, 1810.47
4, 73.92, 13.53, 1811.97
5, 71.60, 13.97, 1808.79
6, 75.21, 13.30, 1810.75
7, 75.27, 13.28, 1809.75
8, 70.72, 14.14, 1808.75
9, 139.56, 7.17, 1808.84
10, 145.24, 6.89, 1809.51
11, 91.23, 10.96, 1810.10
12, 38.86, 25.73, 1807.98
13, 138.13, 7.24, 1808.50
14, 151.04, 6.62, 1807.91
15, 39.53, 25.30, 1808.52
I guess I understand that you memory should be 3,5 + 0,5, a total of 4096,and the log shows 4352,rooted perhaps... Or do you crow about the memory 1808 and think on ultra so many eats card,and the other under 4гектара you,Vasya special????

And if we know in-lang-level 1 class,but not you,it's to tell You,that
System memory usage is the consumption of RAM by the system/game,and not the memory card,so suck it this log or erase...
And tell us,the great BRAIN why such drawdown, from 150 to 39 FPS in your log...

dobro4insky
you flushed,then 1)do not consider yourself smarter than me klovun!I spetsalno test log with textures high(not 6 but 3 GB,Dada) and there are the same logs!absolutely!+-1 fps.And the same drawdownin the logs like with textures ultra for 6GB(if you need logs and proof,I certainly have skin-on plush,get http://rghost.ru/7zbtJdZVM 89 fps,already almost 2 fps more than with textures on ultra!

Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (4352 MB) this for example?
How do I know why the game determined it so?MB it's hers and the typo,I was what?system my you know,and MSI when I measured it VRAM even on ultra not more than 3600 yuzala(see software restricted NVIDIA 970,well, it is however, plus,0.5, unnecessary in fact).Now to the first question-or curve,or a bug with these ppsmi who allegedly promazyvaetsya to 40and that on ultra high,this is clearly either a bug or drawdown when loading the test,because in the game I have a flight even on ultra very smooth 87 fps average,lack of VRAM is not felt,compared to the high textures lost literally 2 fps. I'm sure if you do performance test of this game,you also drawdown will be up to 40 in the log,because as described above-to see how the test runs there from 40 fps here and the log,and even in the test I wrote for example, a MINIMUM AVERAGE of 60-65 FPS 87-89!crow is on or your log will throw?

And tell us,the great BRAIN why such drawdown, from 150 to 39 FPS in your log...
There are no losses,neither in the game nor in the test,cock amdshnye merged and is nonsense)))

p.s. just swallow and not crowed,ultra test Average FPS: 87.62
Max FPS: 145.24
Min FPS: 59.92