Fair pvp. Poll (Diablo 2)
Today, with some regularity, tournaments are held according to the rules of fair pvp with prize rewards for the winners.But there are not as many people willing to participate in the tournament as we would like. In this regard, a poll is being conducted in this topic, literally:
"What prevents me from registering and participating in the fair pvp tournament?"
Some of the possible answers:
* I don’t have time
* I don’t have fair pvp experience
* Know beforehand that I’ll lose
* I don’t like fair pvp rules
* I would go to tournaments if they were held faster (I don’t like the organization)
* I not interesting because there is no balance between the characters
* I am not happy with the prize pool
* I have suspicions that opponents are using prohibited programs
* My own version
Let me remind you that the "passivity" of players in fair pvp is the player's choice of his tactics of the game, you cannot impose on the player to play aggressively. Each player, creating a character, has already chosen a style of play for himself in advance. And each character class has a different degree of attack / attack capabilities - some are strong in attack, and some in a defensive style. Mana pool also affects.
PC tournaments with media coverage
Yes, on NTV it is necessary to show this with an announcer in the studio and reports from the scene, interviews with the organizers and screenshots of victims' messages in the chat.
An example of an interview with one of the organizers
- Hello! Please tell us what is the idea behind your event and what is the possible reason for the players' dissatisfaction?
- 
- Oh, I see. Well, good luck in this difficult matter, we hope this will somehow change the situation on the server.
bd_sm [TDPG]
Yes, that's right. PC encourages players to think about pvp: where to find the right items and how to play against another player who will enter games and impose battle.
I practiced the PC at the beginning or almost the beginning of the season, krch as soon as I collected it. The players didn't have any motivation, they just accelerated hbr for half an hour and that's it. Nobody even tried to camp at the entrance to the throne, everything was very passive.
Like a maniac, he wanted the victim to resist, but got dodiks with Stockholm cider.
Corydoras
window d2 it prompts to close.
When you suck 5 hbr in a row from the body in abs and with infikomi + fullok belt.
and you only got a pesant krawn and a fall rune with hf ... It is
necessary to prohibit fulki within 10 minutes after the host has put it! Or finally, on the software, prohibit fullers. What for they are needed there. At least somehow it will be possible to shower with slippers at the entrance to the throne ..
bd_sm [TDPG]
Your right logic, how many pvp players have you added?
Doesn't it seem to you that since no growth of pvp follows from the pc and never should be .. Is there something wrong with the logic of you and the pvp admin?
Oh, sorry, tyzh took the proposal to ban Fulk seriously .. What kind of logic are we talking about ...
I never wanted to offend people with spare chromosomes .. Apparently it's a liberal ... So you hang on there
Odmen is a simple troll. Appearing once a year and agreeing with debilestic proposals (with yours, by the way, mostly -_- snoopers) ..
Although the idea with the guards is funny purely as a rofloturik. But only on a snake, Schaub flew around the perimeter just .. why do we need Blood Moore with the guards? where not to mark exactly the radius of the flight of the guards? If there is a limited area in the form of a snake, even without guards?
BUT .... Consider them seriously in the topic that he himself created Shoby Shoto somehow, ala pvp from his knees to raise ??
Fuck finally the admin, in the discussion of the passive, if nothing is written on the server side ..
And all the other proposed anti-passive rules are just by eye and any organizer can simply register them in the rules of the tour. And finally your position was outlined in the first post about the liability ..
Dobermn
Honestly, I think that about the perversion of builds (buildings), you can not worry too much. Anyone there is a hydro-magpie or a poizon necrov, and so they are killed without any problems by any normal character. And besides, such assemblies are usually preferred by, let's say, not too experienced players who fall from a regular lock.
bd_sm [TDPG]
Yes, it can be. Then you can proceed as follows: technical tuition is issued at the discretion of the moderator. That is, if the second number conducts a duel as expected, then there are no questions for him: for example, Necr played against the BVC competently, avoided his attacks, knocked down the chains, fired competently, let the trainers, etc., then here the barb is to blame - you need it was better to play. If the necr stupidly clamps the teleport and flies away as soon as the barb appears in sight, then the modernization can give out the techluz to the necr itself. The main idea is that the possibility of getting a technical defeat, like the sword of Damocles, threatens both players, prompting them to be active.
Dobermn
on a peg, but it works very clumsily and you can't talk about it (oh my god)
Greenaa Morningstar
Well, nafig, we will lift pvp from our knees with firkos and pitch.
Savonarol1
You can enter the problem from the side of the competence of the moderator, but then you should have a lot of moderators, and let the players agree on which modernization they will be judged. When a player of the type chooses a moderator himself, technical problems become his problem. If there are few mods, then frequent attacks and discontent are possible. Of course, all this can be ignored, but in the case of a choice, the problem generally fades into the background.
bd_sm [TDPG]
can you still troll the author? otherwise he does not redeem and reacts, but we raise it online at the expense of lulz. everyone is happy.
bd_sm [TDPG]
: - *
Not even gotten much.
Or I'm getting old. Or the liberal is perceived as a zosky insult today ..
1. It takes years to put on a combat-ready charm without wigs.
2. Unscrupulous players, of whom there are the majority, are clearly playing with triangles.
hypehypehype
Soon an uncle with big ears will look here and will answer you this question like this: "EVERYTHING WORKS AS DESIGNED .... BY ME!". And he will advise, if they say you don’t like something, open the cork at the bottom of the pool and leak your favorite server with us. I can say the same about all pvp disputes.