3 New Notifications

New Badge Earned
Get 1K upvotes on your post
Life choices of my cat
Earned 210

Drag Images here or Browse from your computer.

Trending Posts
Sorted by Newest First
M
MrWorld 20.12.21 01:07 am

Fallout 4 or The Witcher 3? (Fallout 4)

This year there will be 2 top contenders for GOTY and RPG of the Year. Write your reasons and which game will be better? What do you think
207 Comments
Sort by:
L
Loken3 20.12.21

I'm really looking forward to the new Folich, I hope for interesting quests and elaborate characters. If it is delivered, it will be a serious competitor to the witcher. I always didn’t care about the graphon. But to be honest, part 3 was not very impressed, I liked New Vegas more.

V
Vanya Rygalov 20.12.21

Played, played the third Witcher ... Not rolling, not interesting, nudota. What to play? There is nothing new that is normal. Dust off New Vegas ... and away we go. As if I had never played before. A harsh, crunchy igruha for some guys. What the hell was I wasting time on Genka?

Falich !!!

T
TTG 20.12.21

The Witcher is not an RPG. F4 is a purebred RPG. Folich won, due to the absence of competitors this year in terms of genre.

w
warp 37 20.12.21

AddTwisted GP-5 rev. 2.0, vice versa. Bethesda games are as weak as purebred RPGs.

T
TTG 20.12.21

warp 37
There is no roleplaying in The Witcher 3. It is based on combat and rolls. And the gazebo during its long history of one of the founders of the genre and the leading developers of RPG has fooled only Skyrim and another product created for the sake of profit. The only original idea of ​​the witcher that you will not find anywhere else is his setting. And that is not invented, but taken from books. In general, catching a person who is about to go to sleep is not very good. So that it does not repeat itself.

p
pochtipushkin 20.12.21

It is too early to draw any conclusions, while the second challenger is just “warming up”. The topic can only give rise to another srach.

In fact, the Witcher 3, despite my long expectations, did not live up to them at all. I played only 30 hours. Somehow everything turned out monotonously. There are practically no options for research (cannot be compared with the feeling when you find some kind of dungeon or factory or something else in Fallout), pumping the character disappointed (for me, it just does not exist at all), it just does not pull with mobs (since they have experience do not bring practically). Probably not a fan of the plot for the sake of research and character development. ... ... At the moment, I don't see GOTY in The Witcher 3, but it's not a fact that Fallout 4 will be better.

V
Vanya Rygalov 20.12.21

pochtipushkin +++++++++++
In fact, the Witcher 3, despite my long expectations, did not live up to them at all .... Somehow everything turned out monotonously.
Dude, you scold the Witcher ... Aren't you afraid? Do you know, unfortunate one, that as soon as I click with my beak, hundreds and hundreds of battle woodpeckers of gene-readers will flock down and minus you to the very least.

... but not the fact that Fallout 4 will be better.
But here I disagree. The guys who riveted Falych have never messed up. Why all of a sudden, with what fright should they screw up the new Falych? They have something, unlike the Poles (to fuck up such a series) brains in place. Do not bzdi - they will not fix it.

p
pochtipushkin 20.12.21

Vanya Rygalov
Regarding the wild desire of the fans of The Witcher 3 to minus everything, even reasoned negative posts about my masterpiece game, I know firsthand. I was ready for this from the very beginning.

God forbid that they don't mess with Folich, perhaps the last hope this year for a good RPG for me personally.

P
Playersaharan 20.12.21

Vanya Rygalov
Well, yes, not once. Let's forget about Skyrim and F3 for a minute, huh?

D
Droma 20.12.21

Rpg then Rpg, but as for me, completely different games and comparing them, who is better than who is worse, makes no sense.

f
fire_Rising 20.12.21

I think there will be a choice between Batman: Arkham Knight and The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. You shouldn't expect much from the fallout, in the 3rd part they squeezed out everything that was possible.

W
WilliamSXE 20.12.21

Alexey Eltsov
Look at the release date of the third part. Almost 7 years have passed. Since then, they have learned a lot, and technology has progressed far ahead. And besides, they promised a lot, a lot of new things. I see no reason to be overly skeptical about the 4th part.

f
fire_Rising 20.12.21

WilliamSXE
As for the gameplay and videos, everything is clear for a long time ..)) "Gone very far and for a long time"

T
TTG 20.12.21

Silly topic. She's very stupid. And it's not even about different genres.
It is worth starting with the importance of each company. The gazebo is primarily a studio with an ancient history, and the first part of the scrolls, for a minute, came out much earlier than the birth date of users raising the question of the superiority of one game over another, namely the 94th year. For comparison, the beloved by many Gothic was released in 2001. Using the method of mathematical calculation, it is easy to guess about the innumerable army of fans of the series, several generations, (raised on the products of the gazebo with their own charter of salt in games and the understanding that graphics are needed only in shooters) who got the hang of it on the basis of Morrowind and Obla and were ready to remake shoveled the entire semi-finished product under the name of Skyrim, which did catch on, but only once and only for the passage of the main quest and visiting cities. Then an epiphany came, and frankly slipshod moments began to rush into the eyes. But as always, there were those who did not want to admit the obvious. It was the mods that were taken out.

Talking about the relatively young Projekt RED in relation to Bethesda as a competitor is inappropriate. Indeed, in one trilogy you will not achieve what the gazebo has done in its history.
A little earthy. Skyrim, albeit in its released form, looks a little casual compared to its predecessors, but it is a pure RPG with an open world, and the Witcher is an Action rpg without the most important feature of an RPG - there is no role-playing in it.
The only thing that plays into the hands of Projekt RED is a noticeably increasing level in each of the parts, which cannot be said about the gazebo, which is quite possibly already just rowing tons of dallarav and no more, due to the last part of the Scrolls. But in F4, they clearly decided to get back on track.
For me personally, it is super stupid to compare the game aspects. still on the way to them there are many reasons to name this fight of different weight categories.

M
MrSmoke67 20.12.21

sozhah
Well, there was no plot in the fallout 2, so it was not about the plot. It was about quests and opportunities. Where else can you put things out, leaving only charged dynamite in your inventory, go to the square where children will rob you and in 30 seconds these same children will be torn to pieces? Where can you get a pseudonym and star in porn, after which you will be praised by prostitutes on the streets? Where can you force your newfound wife to star in the same porn, and then sell her into slavery, lying to her father that she died, because of what he will have a heart attack? It was about Fallout 2, not about the plot. There it was possible to set "intelligence" - 1, after which everyone would take yy for a down, with an IQ - 1, and all this was accompanied by entertaining dialogues.

F
Fat Vladimir 20.12.21

Digger online.

s
solus. 20.12.21

Initially, a stupid statement of the question, like an ancient anecdote: "But if you set a bear on a shark, who will win?" Obviously, everyone will be the first in their element. The shkolota, screaming from the "graphene and boobs" of the witcher, may well confine himself to this game, without complicating his primitive life with an understanding of what constitutes the true tsimes of the fallout.

PS: more than fifty minuses that the first post typed, which initiated this stupid discussion, perfectly demonstrates the delusional nature of the topic itself. and the schoolchildren's level of development of its author;)

V
Vanya Rygalov 20.12.21

Initially stupid statement of the question ... The
question is stupid. Would it be equally stupid to answer it?

w
we get what we deserve 20.12.21

In general, it is strange to ask this question before the release of the game. It is necessary to judge after the opportunity to play both.

M
MrSmoke67 20.12.21

Well, of course, the Witcher, the fallout is shit, no graphics or gameplay, for normal people the fallout ended after the release of the second part (Well, New Vegas was still playable). In general, I will not paint everything here, The Witcher 3 is the game of the year, and the fallout sucks.
PS Well, now for those who read the messages to the end: Although I love the Witcher series with all my heart, I still love Fallout more, so I hope that the 4th part will not be outright shit and we will see a truly gorgeous game.)