What do you think about the graphics the Witcher 3 ? (The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt)

graphics and streamlined chic. my characteristics are partially fit into the minimal salary of the Witcher but, exactly play on medium-low without any problems(45 fps in cities and in the middle of the map, all 60 on the edge of the map and the areas/caves), even set stlm and reseed for him

Lisstoman
Hair change solely on Geralt. All other NPCs Hairworks does not affect at all. Tested by me many times. And feel I a standard hair like you much more than this negociado green.

Mercurionio
Heh. Sighted you a little. And you forgot to add that lark you see all changes from prehear) And technically you can't disable in the Witcher fiziks, because he stands there by default.

I talked to one of them, lovers and experts are good and bad graphics engines. He said, terrible graphics. I was surprised, for me, this statement was absurd and meaningless. The picture is incredibly high-quality, distinctive, I would say perfect. Textures, shadows, and so do the fantastic. Lighting is just a work of art, it was possible for ten minutes to watch the sunrise or orange sunset. Hair, wool and so on is generally a separate conversation, good of course. Special effects - just a great, balanced, not too much, not hypertrophied picture too zamylivaya or dimming. What he didn't like. He didn't like it relatively simple and not new solutions which save video memory of your mother. He didn't like the sprites: grass, vegetation. But they executed perfectly! Anyway, the sprites, see the Sprites? - so, there are these people, what can I say.

It turns out I am not alone I am still using a GTS 450 video card. You know, I'm still happy.

In the game with open world beautiful graphics ever seen! Everything on maximum at 2560x1440

Lisstoman
If I sighted it padmanathan.

Cut graphics compared to E3, but it still looks acceptable 8/10

The graph is good there, well, not super straight, but good, could be much better to make a count, but will a lot of money and time, and few people will buy because many will not be supported by this point but still open world but still huge. The grass there is not 2D, just in the same picture drawn a few.

I agree with those who argue that such graphics as in the Witcher they are in games with open world ever seen! I am also 10 years have not seen!
in order not to be unfounded. ladies and gentlemen, it's almost ultra infusions!
Spoiler

not top, but not bad.
the water just did not like at all. clay of some kind.
and optimization on the album could deliver.

Wonderful graphics, especially mesmerizing during sunset and sunrise. Also, I have not seen anywhere else such high quality textures, with a maximum consumption of memory is 1700mb in Novigrad. What is important is optimization - consistently on ultra settings holds 45-50 fps on r9 380 2gb out of the room, then there are no jerks when it is 60 fps, then abruptly drops to 30 then back to 60. Disappointed only smoothing, which is not as such

ipman4
Well, Yes, the world is empty. Supposedly random quests found in the journey, still scripted and not random.

If you like graphics, why are you asking others? The point of knowing the other person's opinion, if you convince him you can't.
And on the subject, graphics fire.

Marksman1231
Well just a person interested in the opinions of others about this, he did this, and asked the question: What do you think about the graphics the Witcher 3 ?.

standards

one of the best gronow, face ,armor, monsters, all to small chastichek done and the lighting is also stunning

Nature, lighting, characters, design on top. Pumped up only the texture in the cities and the lack of tessellation.

The graphics are excellent:

Calling Butthurt
Well, the game has no porn, so the working tools of the Geralt model no.