Will there be a third world war?

Open the map: Libya (oil spent), Saud. Arabia (oil, the main U.S. ally), Iraq (oil spent), Syria (the Russian base, the strategic control of the Mediterranean sea, because if Turkey will close the Bosphorus, there is no getting out of the Russian Navy in the region. almost spent...).
Now the plans of our partners: Syria (to shift strategically important base, the transit of oil to Europe), Iran (oil, one of the strongest players in Central Asia after Russia and China). Further, while the implementation of the Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan (the creation of tension at the borders of the Russian Federation, when a smoldering conflict with the Ukraine and Georgia). Well, the transfer of the theatre in Russia, with the actual separation.
So what I have is: are we in Syria for what would be the theater of war has not passed in Russia.

Quote from the upcoming God of War in 2018, when Kratos tells his son about the war:
Wars are fought for two reasons - for the sake of survival or benefits.
Underline.

Summer23 wrote:
base of the Russian Federation, the strategic control of the Mediterranean sea, because if Turkey will close the Bosphorus, there is no getting out of the Russian Navy in the region. almost spent...
The Montreux Convention on the status of the Straits.
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%9C%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%82%D1%80%D1%91_%D0%BE_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%81%D0%B5_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B2
The Montreux Convention retains the merchant ships of all countries freedom of passage through the Straits in peacetime and in wartime. However, the mode of passage of warships differences in the black and non-black sea States.
To trade is not prohibited.
Summer23 wrote:
Now the plans of our partners: Syria (to shift strategically important base, the transit of oil to Europe)
How the presence or absence of a strategically important base in Syria may affect the transit of oil to Europe because the passage of merchant ships is not restricted?
Summer23 wrote:
Iran (oil, one of the strongest players in Central Asia after Russia and China).
Exactly what more specifically include the plans of our partners in Iran, except for stating that Iran, one of the strongest players in Central Asia, access to Russia and China?
Summer23 wrote:
Further, while the implementation of the Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan (the creation of tension at the borders of the Russian Federation, when a smoldering conflict with the Ukraine and Georgia).
Maybe it's worth to ask the leadership of the countries listed above - and even if there is the creation of tensions along their borders? Or is it the fruit of a sick imagination of home-grown scientists, a La Solov'ev-Svistunov-Kiselev? And who is this tension, I creates?
Summer23 wrote:
Well, the transfer of the theatre in Russia, with the actual separation.
Razdevalka with pernaselli doesn't? Again, who exactly would that be done? Specifically the names of the countries who dared to stick his snout in the pot with the Russian borscht?

AlterOwl
Well, Yes but you have not respected in any order rotten soul for the Fatherland trading? Oh, look, now, stupid propaganda,there will be shooting from Lithuania fake of course,about the collapse of several principalities.Yes, but they all have the imagine higher education.True son of the Fatherland's just what?

Krucinski the quiet badass
I don't know maybe most of those who Basayev and Hatab called fighters for dermokratiyu not?

Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
The Montreux Convention on the status of the Straits...the Montreux Convention retains the merchant ships of all countries freedom of passage through the Straits in peacetime and in wartime. However, the mode of passage of warships differences in the black and non-black sea States.
To trade is not prohibited.
Not very funny on the wiki to refer to , that more trash noble .. to judge what is happening in the world and that 1) Impose sanctions on other States and countries , so that would make its economy has not suffered . 2) Blame others but there is no evidence , and at the same time also bombed state . Or just one showing the tube and screw up the state ... 3) Mainly Western countries to care about the moral and political foundations 4) Around Russia NATO air defense surrounded , we try to explain that this is not against us . the power to build up , like sheep driven to the slaughter ... 5) we rubbed how old is that democracy is almost a Paradise on earth for four years to fully clear ... You're talking about what the Convention actually say ??? Care many would like for this Convention , and the us keeps the UN in one place . Now the worse situation than it was in the days of the Soviet Union the cold war...History already trying in their own way to rewrite .... In General, do not tell me to your Convention )) I'm Tired to this thread to read the nonsense , all good ) But I am happy there are adequate people here, but the person I responded to does not include ! ))

the killer of the Anglo-Saxons
the killer of the Anglo-Saxons wrote:
I don't know maybe most of those who Basayev and Hatab called fighters for dermokratiyu not?
What given me this questions answer? And if not more difficult, the presence of punctuation, too, would not be amiss.

Nervios
Nervios wrote:
Not very funny on the wiki to refer to , that more trash noble ..
However, the Montreux Convention on the status of the channels is independent from the garbage supplied information about her. In this case, the source in no way affects the very existence of this international Treaty.
Nervios wrote:
In General, do not tell me to your Convention ))
Can the laughter and even burst of laughter, but the throughput of merchant ships in the Bosphorus is not way not affect.

Nervios
It is not useful to prove the same when the countries are so eager to tear ass about the territorial integrity of Ukraine, why it was silent with the collapse of the USSR and Yugoslavia with joy razderbanit.

Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
Again, who exactly would that be done? Specifically the names of the countries who dared to stick his snout in the pot with the Russian borscht?

God Bless America!

Krucinski the quiet badass
However, the Montreux Convention on the status of the channels is independent from the garbage supplied information about her. In this case, the source in no way affects the very existence of this international Treaty.
You allude to the possibility of breach of contract.The contract is not a guarantee of protection from illegal actions.And the media can paint a different picture.

the killer of the Anglo-Saxons Admit. Model behavior that you're trying to play - I hope you're just having fun., inherent in the people hopeless but dirty. They understand that their hands out of the ass and brain with IQ115 - no one else will need it. But economic liberalization can benefit the people are enterprising, intelligent, brave and strong. And from the pettiness and martapaquette and easier, just because of their selfishness, like you, or someone you, again, play will be on the side of madness, dragging in the cesspool of the others, bright and beautiful people. They first run out of his dusty little town, on a picket in support of lifting travel abroad. They also support the Patriotic Internet" and the closure of foreign resources. It's somewhat gross. But experiencing.

Nervios
We have brought. You probably Admiral, one of those Russian Armada... of ships during the first world war? Shoot? Well... if you believe in it. Brownnose name Kuznetsov, already screwed up Ross-Navy so that as time to leave was the right decision. Not only that would not be funny in the background the Armada Free States... and that nothing exploded, drowned, just don't come apart from vibration flying over that rust - Rafale and Typhoon. Assad has a chemical weapons, believe me. It is clear that you don't inspire confidence, the dead Syrian children, srygivaniya before an agonizing death, his own lungs... You and the tragedy in Kemerovo is not rocked and laughed and smiled. But Israel Often bombs that bastard Assad, warehouses, bases. Moreover, the departure of the Israeli air force is worth more than all the Russian shit, the 70s that is on these Syrian warehouses. Why do they do it? Blow potentially dangerous for the Jewish State, toys. But Russian px on their border that throws the air defense of the terrorists, the drawings of the rocket stages for all cross-eyed dictators... Makes you act tough and despite the cost of these actions. Sometimes even without asking. And about the shame. Even if your blue dream and reality - Russian air defense has hit a couple of rockets... Why not hit by any Allied Bomber? They flew low and slow.

[Denis] wrote:
Therefore, this character does not make sense to conduct dialogues
I thought because you're a lying sack of shit.
You yourself apparently believe in the fairy tales.
Sitting there with a crown on their head and consider themselves smarter than others.
And in fact, never and anywhere did not explain anything.
you a question, and the answer is I'm not going to explain.
you need to change the nickname for a Chatterbox Balabanovic.


Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
Wants to hear - Yes hear! Wants to see - but see!...
Well, Yes, Yes. In the void, too, meaning can be found if desired.
It is the way you like. Too many words, little sense.
Only you have a more elevated epithets. However you even have the sense to discern through the high epithets.
Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
By the way, very simple and necessary question.
Well, as it was given to me, I will answer you as dressed in our dialogue.
Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
What personally gives you war in this region? Is there any material benefit for you personally from this military operation? And if not, is it possible this benefit after completion of the operation, again specifically for you personally?
Material benefit means a reduction in utility bills, the cost of motor fuel, the reduction of prices for food and stuff. One word - everyday daily expenses.
But if there is any benefit, then do we need all this military romp, worth a lot of money?
Well, if you're a fool, then of course you do not have a profitable.
I gave above the answer is the Wing.
ihappy wrote:
If Syria wins the LIH, it is actually a victory for the United States.
This means that Syria will leave Russian military bases.
Pass through Syria gas pipeline, which will hit below the belt throughout the Russian Federation. And you will touch first and foremost.
And as a bonus, terrorism, etc. What for and you can be there, but because there have to be these bonuses are enjoyable.
And now the quiet badass, use your head.
How the economy will affect you?
A strong economy is good for an ordinary citizen?
Military bases outside the territory of the Russian Federation, it is good to the ordinary citizen?
The allies, it is bad for Russia? And thus bad for an ordinary citizen?

If you think that the ordinary citizen from this bad, I was not mistaken in you.

Will there be a third world war?
Spoiler
In essence, that trump became President - is absurd. So no wonder the third world.
Veterans of the Third world will not (W. Mondale)

ihappy
I thought because you're a lying sack of shit.
You yourself apparently believe in the fairy tales.
Sitting there with a crown on their head and consider themselves smarter than others.
And in fact, never and anywhere did not explain anything.
you a question, and the answer is I'm not going to explain.
you need to change the nickname for a Chatterbox Balabanovic.
I ask another simple question the answer to which can not give:
Would you have anything to prove to somebody that you still do not believe any scenario?

Will the third world? No. Who will fight? On the one hand, NATO, and the other one Russian? Yes do not tell. Russia has no real allies, and all allies of the Papuans flee as soon as the whiff of fried.

Krucinski the quiet badass wrote:
flea forgot that by law we must add that this organization is forbidden in Russia)
so what did you forget?

Krucinski the quiet badass
In General, I heard you.
Your arguments and questions, say that you are only buzzwords you know. And then, apply them for other purposes.

[Denis] wrote:
I ask another simple question the answer to which can not give:
Would you have anything to prove to somebody that you still do not believe any scenario?
Hey, are you Jewish?
You know, in society first decided to answer the questions, and then ask your own.
You balabol balabanovic learn to answer the questions, and then I'll tell you.

ihappy
And I did you have to answer the questions? Since when,when you ignore my and should I?Aren't you arrogant?

ihappy
ihappy wrote:
In General, I heard you.
Well, thank God. So the theory that after cutting off all the limbs of fleas losing the rumor is not true.
And....? Heard, and thought it prudent not further to participate in the experiment with nothing concrete, except for pathos and pathos, which, as you know, on bread you will not smear?
ihappy wrote:
Your arguments and questions, say that you are only buzzwords you know.
Words are not smart or stupid, it's just a word - a tool which, in particular, can produce the same nonsense, in recognition of which you fancy yourself an expert (I hope you have not forgotten that talking to a fool?). Stool - clever word or stupid?
ihappy wrote:
And then, apply them for other purposes.
Yes, and here you are, as always, right. We assume that you're overriding (I'll even pluscom is inserted). Or merged, as they like to claim some fleas, which is not alien to assenizatorskie sewage aesthetics.
Spolecnost out of curiosity, are all the same
ihappy wrote:
Pass through Syria gas pipeline, which will hit below the belt throughout the Russian Federation.
Out of compassion for the defeated and merged the fool. Please, answer - whose pipeline, how and where?

And [Denis] of course, the Jew. Here, all who want fervently to March in the herd - the Jews. Didn't you know?