Optimization (Rise of the Tomb Raider)

fx 6300 and r9 290 none th not enough for this game ?

Lisstoman
Yeah, yeah: i7 + gtx 970 = 15-30fps. What are you talking about small?
PS I'm not talking about your config, I have no game at all, just the forums went and watched the stream with the tests.

Empirically checked that lags depend only on the quality settings of the texture. All other settings can be set to maximum. In my case (i7-980Х + gtx 780) so it is. But the texture just high. Very high in the cutscenes terrible lag.

Optimization in the game and navryatli will be delivered(worse to make easy). Consumption of VRAM unreasonably high relative to this low point. On the other hand is the least of the problems,because If only the memory really so much decided - even gtx Titan 6gb would tear ass 970ую with 3.5 GB,but in fact the opposite is true on all settings. No optimization,only the curve of the port in cooperation with NVIDIA is the root of all evils

where NVIDIA will touch everything will be through the ass

Yes what Batman did lark all things are bad and money is considerable to take a quality shit

Scorponozhek
Only crashes on i7+970 will be 15-30 frames.

let the average graphics but stable fps without terrible freezes,lags, fps etc

so there is at least low graphics still good drawdown

FX smoothing ( plus it is in the first part ate Oh-Oh-Oh) and in the wood it reinforce at 8x. Flight ultra gorgeous. (30-50 rode before)
From the graphical furious that the plane does not plow ( even in forced mode) and the picture breaks decently.

DEN63RUSS
My resolution is 2560x1440 everything on maximum except SSAA (SSAA x2 is)
Works at 30 FPS consistently (at 1920x1080 gives 40 FPS at maximum settings + SSAA x4)
The graphics are very cool!!!
Operatives eats from 10 to 23 GB (I think this point is also correct)
After they fix otpimization exactly 10 frames will be added and will do fine)
The game has already passed, and the patch to be sooner than the end of February (I think) because at each location the game behaves differently in terms of optimization

atleast 10 fps added rules would be ))

in anticipation of amd's driver 16.1.1 like there is little we can optimize

Lisstoman
I told you about max and spoke in full hd, it is 970-I did not take out, apparently not even in 2K resolution and 1080, and you're talking about buckets))
This game has become such because of danovy + cunning Huang is my hand, where NVIDIA hand made - first there all through one place, because the first part turned out standards for optimization.

Yes it is worse than Batman th may

Here are my settings fps 50~60: i5 4590,R9 290,16gb ram

r9 290x i7 2600 16 gigs of 2400 frequency, it seems everything is good but 60 frames is not felt to be honest, but I was completely satisfied.

and no one this garbage ? type die the game crashes to desktop with an error, or have changed the costume game and again crash with the same error

DEN63RUSS
While this was not noticed. Truth once was that the game hung and didn't respond to any button. Had to close the three buttons. But obviously it was something random because the re-passage of the place did not cause the unresponsiveness.

Scorponozhek
Safely at the maximum speed in fhd 970 will remove from the ssaa or fxaa antialiasing 50 frames on average, but if you are silly, then you certainly will put on 970 ssaax2 or ssaax4 and get 20-30 frames.