Optimization (Rise of the Tomb Raider)

Indoril Nerevar
sad=( but elected on the laptop at max over the top 40-50 frames идетXD
Have a laptop with the same har-mi, only play on the very least 900p, shadows medium made

mister611
the system unit clean,cooling is good,the way windows 10 is really more fps?I'm on 7 x64 just sit,by the way I now looked-during game CPU usage is 0%,do not know why,probably because of this, and frieze,I have arkham knight is ultra 75фпс,dying light and gta 5 also ultra 75фпс,CPU usage averages 35%,but in this game 0%

mister611
Fuck consumption, and 3500-4300 11200мб RAM(MB) video. How, then, game consoles were working, the same memory at best half of those listed. Maybe the game runs the virtual machine immitiruya console, and it works. Then the memory of course will be spent nemeryannom. Yet of course the protection system of eating, but it's more critical not to memory, but to the number of cores CPU.

vitalik76
On a PC has a completely different graphics, much improved, hence the consumption. But the appetite is really too big from the game.
Now checked the CPU usage in the game is nonsense .. 20-25%.

Thompson1929
Well, 0% certainly could not be download PERC )) Is something you have the tester is acting up. And what about the fps in the top-10 against the 7-ke is not know I've been on 10-ke, as soon as of. the release took place on 7-ke is not played.

the old 1-gigs cards from scratch but you can play!
Rise of the Tomb Raider gtx 460

Bard Buttercup
in my config look in a profile as a cha on ultra this fps?

diagen138
Well. 45-55 on average (this is on the basis of the Soviet sirusa) Below 40 prosidaet Lark, settings all the hairy stuff just only be on and not ultra and antialiasing smaa, 45-55 fps, confirm, FHD resolution. But I vidyuhi 4GB of VRAM. And by the way, the driver 359.06 December not the latest, may be more fps

Bard Buttercup
you mean where Lenin is cha 45-55?
because I only have 35 -40

diagen138
well, specifically on Lenin, I did not measure, but on average below 40 do not prosidaet in the center of the Soviet base, where lesoruby near the entrance to the tomb, where the logging stands, etc., in those places, and where a local man of the descendants of the additional setting gives Lark near the fire, so there 45-55 fps in those places

Bard Buttercup
interesting cha the iron I have at the sawmill 35-41

but I have high 45-60

diagen138
have you hopping VRAM?
PS Read the iron in the profile already, and all sorts of splash-type deps of field, depth of field, Hbao+ off or on?

Bard Buttercup
MSI H81M-P33, Intel Core i5 4690 3.50( 3.90 tubo). DEEP COOL GMAXX 400. PCI, GIGABYTE GTX 970 4 gb . 4096Mbx2 Kingston 1333. KCAS - 700W.

Bard Buttercup
maybe you're not all on ultra is

diagen138
So, sorry, not everything is on ultra, shadows and sun rays on my high stand, just the system with the installation of the upper slider On a very high (equivalent to ultra), exposes the rays of the sun and shadows is not on ultra but on high, I saw at once, it turns out that the sun's rays, shade, Bush I not on ultra and below. And anti-aliasing smaa for a total of 45-55 fps

Will the game on minimum settings on a Core 2 Duo 6750(2.66 GHz) + Radeon HD 7770? (Tomb raider 2013 standards went at top speed at a resolution of 1280*1024)

Esthetix
Crisis 3 was amazingly optimized. On my old 660Ti, at that time, there was an average of 40-50 frames on max settings+fxaa and nothing sags, and the dialogue is in crisis a billion times better than in Lariska. Now I have a 970, and the crisis in General is running over 60FPS, and Lariska, if not to reduce the textures on *high* it starts a slide show of the great Patriotic War)))

Bard Buttercup
everything is on ultra except shadows and rays but I have no 45-55 odd

Everything on ultra except textures, issues 35-40, when I put textures on high start friezes, the memory is rammed full at the same time. High texture memory the game takes 3 Gb.

vvvjust
Because you memory is not enough for lark to her fullhd sometimes you need more than 4GB of video memory, 980 is also not gushing in it, even in sli, That's fucked up for such a soap is the consumption.