[b] Taelsien [/ b], if they do not differ in complexity and duration, then I see no reason to separate them somehow. DS is definitely even more confident. :)
[quote name = "Azz"] jRPG in its purest form, I think we will see mainly on portables,
on large consoles in super-duper JRPGs, I do not believe that, just in my opinion,
the way they were played in the 90s will not be so play well now,
because only fans need archaism, in general I think that modern jRpg is any rpg in the Japanese style.
It's just that some specific features of the gameplay are a thing of the past. [/ Quote]
Have you played in LO?
[b] DARK_TEMPLAR [/ b], [quote] and ps3 from inpatient facilities, of course. [/ quote] a
list of jRPGs that have come out or are coming out in the near future to the studio, all the rest of the fan basement: gigi:
The king is old, but still he is the king - this is ps2, and everyone else does not pull this title.
ps2 was.inds is. 360 has a chance to become the best in x-ray.
[b] DARK_TEMPLAR [/ b], the funniest thing "of course" looks
[b] ChiefMaster [/ b], [quote] Have you played in LO? [/ quote]
yeah (I liked BD more). This is not the essence of my post, the point is that the genre has freed itself from some technical shackles and is now more blurred to define, therefore, in my opinion, any RPG in Japanese style or seiting can be called jRPG.
[b] Azz [/ b], it seems to me that you shouldn't play with any knowledge of English in zhrpg: gigi:
[b] Osam [/ b], ps1 and ps2 games are supported only in the oldest versions of ps3 and who needs it, when every second has ps2 here? ps3 does not get better from this.
if anything, only 1 zhrpg came out on ps3 - buggy port enchantted arms with 360